Khilafah.com

Wednesday
May 23rd
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Who will fill the government posts in a future Khilafah and from where in society will they be selected from?

E-mail Print PDF

In answer to this there are two factors that need to be considered for someone to be suitable for a ruling position in the Khilafah - capability and strength of ideology.


Capability to Rule

Capability in carrying out the task of ruling is an explicit shar'i (Iegal) condition for the Khaleefah, Assistants (mu'awinoon) and the governors (wulah).

This ruling capability is manifested in certain traits that will enable the person to fulfil the responsibilities of office and manage the affairs of state. These traits are strength of personality, consciousness of Allah (taqwa), kindness and that he should not be one who causes aversion.

1. Strength of personality - The Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم stipulated that the ruler must be strong and that the weak person is not suitable to become a ruler.

Muslim narrated from Abu Dharr who said: "I said: O Messenger of Allah, will you not appoint me as a governor/ruler? He صلى الله عليه وسلم struck my shoulder with his hand then said: "O Abu Dharr, you are weak and it is a trust (amanah). On the Day of Judgement it will be a disgrace and regret except for the one who took it by its right and fulfilled his duty in it."

Strength of personality means the intellectual and emotional strength. It is necessary that this mentality be the ruling mentality by which he understands matters and relationships, and that his emotional disposition (nafsiyya) is that of a ruler who understands he is a ruler so his inclinations are of a leader.

2. Consciousness of Allah (taqwa) - Since the personality trait of strength has within it the potential of domination there is an obvious need for the ruler to have an attribute which protects him from the evil of domination. It is therefore necessary that he has the attribute of taqwa in taking care of the Ummah.

Muslim and Ahmad from Sulayman bin Buraydah from his father: "Whenever the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم would appoint an Amir over an army or expedition, he would command him with taqwa with himself and to be good to those Muslims who are with him."

The ruler, if he is conscious of Allah and fears Him, and accounts himself in his own soul secretly and openly, then this would prevent him from tyranny in the first instance.

3. Kindness - Taqwa alone would not prevent the Khaleefah from harshness and severity since in his taking account of Allah he would restrict himself to His commands and prohibitions. And since he is a ruler, it is natural in his position to be severe and hard, and because of this the Lawgiver (Ash-Shari') commanded him to be friendly and not to be hostile to the citizens.

From Aisha who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم saying in his house of mine: "O Allah, whoever is appointed over any matter of my Ummah and is hostile to them, then be hostile to him! And whoever is appointed over any matter of my Ummah and is friendly to them, then be friendly to him!" [Muslim]

4. Doesn't cause aversion - He also commanded to be one who gives glad tidings not one who repels or turns people away.

From Abu Musa who said: When the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم sent one of his companions in some of his affairs, he would say to him: "Give glad tidings and do not repel people, be easy and do not be hard (to the people)." [Muslim]


Strength of Ideology

The Khilafah is an ideological Islamic State where the Islamic aqeeda (belief) is the basis of the state, its institutions, systems and societal relationships. The Khilafah's strength will depend directly on the strength of the ideology within the state. This means those in ruling positions must be of those who will work in protecting, implementing and propagating the Islamic ideology so the state remains strong and becomes a leading nation in the world.

This means those in ruling positions must be Muslim. This is because the Shari'a (Islamic law) has restricted ruling positions to those who believe in the ideology of the state i.e. Islam. This is no different to any ideological state within the world today. America or Western Europe for example would never accept a Muslim or Communist as President or Prime Minister. The fact that during Obama's Presidential election campaign he was forced to distance himself from any hint of being a ‘secret Muslim', such as removing two Muslim women in headscarfs from standing behind him in a speech is clear evidence of this.

Muhammad Asad in his book ‘The Principles of State and Government in Islam,' writes on this point.

"One cannot escape the fact that no non-Muslim citizen - however great his personal integrity and his loyalty to the state - could, on psychological grounds, ever be supposed to work wholeheartedly for the ideological objectives of Islam; nor, in fairness, could such a demand be made of him. On the other hand, no ideological organization (whether based on religious or other doctrines) can afford to entrust the direction of its affairs to persons not professing its ideology. Is it, for instance, conceivable that a non-Communist could be given a political key position - not to speak of supreme leadership of the state - in Soviet Russia? Obviously not, and logically so: for as long as communism supplies the ideological basis of the state, only persons who identify themselves unreservedly with its aims can be relied upon to translate those aims into terms of administrative policy."

Those in ruling positions must also be just (‘adl) and it is forbidden for them to be transgressors of the ideology (fasiq). The Shari'a has made justice a condition for the witness.

Allah سبحانه وتعالى says:

وَأَشْهِدُوا ذَوَيْ عَدْلٍ مِنْكُمْ

"Call two just witnesses from amongst you." [At-Talaq, 65:2]

Since the Khaleefah, Assistants and Governors rule over witnesses, by greater reason (Bab Awla) they must also be just (‘adl).

Having established the characteristics of those suitable for taking up ruling positions within the Khilafah the next question is where in the state would we find such capable people?

Selection of Rulers during the Umayyad and Abbasid Khilafah

After the period of the Rightly Guided Khaleefahs the rulers in the Khilafah were on the whole selected based on family ties where the Khaleefah would choose the next Khaleefah from his family. This led to the creation of ruling dynasties in the form of the Umayyads, Abbasids and later the Ottomans. The executive branch of the Khilafah started to resemble a monarchy, a period to which the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم referred to in the hadith narrated by Ahmed as a ‘biting kingship'.

Despite the misapplication of appointing rulers in the executive branch, the Islamic State was still a Khilafah, with the legislative and judicial branches held by the ulema (scholarly) class who ensured the shari'a was always implemented by the executive. Conflict between the ulema and executive always existed and ensured the independence of the judicial and legislative branches of government. This conflict came to a head during the inquisition (mihna) of Abbasid Khaleefah al-Ma'mun where Ahmed bin Hanbal refused to concede the Islamic position that the Qur'an was not created in favour of al-Ma'mun's deviant view that the Qur'an was created. Abu Hanifa, Imam Shafi'i, Imam Malik, Imam Nawawi and Ibn Taymiyyah all faced persecution during their times for accounting the rulers and ensuring shari'a was always implemented by the executive.

One of the benefits cited for a monarchy is the clear line of succession for future rulers of the Kingdom. Historically, this was seen as providing a stable system that prevents a power vacuum after the King dies. When Mu'awiyah was Khaleefah he was the first to introduce the concept of hereditary bay'ah (pledge of allegiance) where the Khaleefah would nominate his son or other close relative to succeed him. In Mu'awiyah's case he nominated his son Yazeed and took bay'ah for him before he died. The first to convince Mu'awiyah of such an idea was Al-Mughirah ibn Shu'bah who was Mu'awiyah's governor in Basrah. He visited Mu'awiyah in Ash-Sham and said, "O Leader of the Believers! You are aware of what this Ummah faced of disorder (fitnah) and difference, and death is due on you; and I am afraid when it comes to you what had happened after the murder of Uthman will happen to the people. So assign to the people an outstanding person so that they take refuge in him, and make that person your son Yazeed."

Mu'awiyah became convinced of the benefits in nominating his son and proceeded to implement this plan despite opposition from the senior companions (sahaba) within the state.

Regardless of the perceived benefit in having a clear line of succession as in a monarchy, Muslims are restricted by the shari'a rules. This deviation from the shari'a rules in misapplying the bay'ah resulted in severe weaknesses creeping in to the political structures of the state and in fact the hereditary bay'ah made the Khilafah less stable.

This weakness and instability occurred because restricting the post of Khaleefah to an elite few prevented any other aspiring candidates from reaching a ruling position. Political parties within the state were then forced to rebel and seize power militarily since no other mechanism was available to them for achieving power.

This is what the Abbasids did by seizing Persia and Iraq and using them as a platform to capture total power away from the Umayyads whom they then killed. They then followed in the footsteps of the Umayyads restricting the authority to the family of Banu Hashim in place of Banu Ummayyah.

Later the Fatimids took over the province of Egypt and established a state there. They tried to use this as a support point for transferring the rule of the Islamic State to the sons of Fatimah, daughter of the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم. Their action caused instability within the Islamic State and stalled the Jihad allowing the crusaders to occupy the holy lands.

Selection of rulers by the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم and the Rightly Guided Khaleefahs

A future Khilafah will not follow in the footsteps of the Umayyad and Abbasid Khilafah's by selecting rulers based on tribal and family ties. The model for ruling is taken from the sunnah and the ways of the Rightly Guided Khaleefahs (Khulufa Rashida).

On the authority of Abu Najih Al-Erbadh bin Sariah, who said: The Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم gave us a sermon by which our hearts were filled with fear and tears came to our eyes. We said: "O Messenger of Allah, it is as though this is a farewell sermon, so counsel us." He صلى الله عليه وسلم said: "I counsel you to fear Allah and to give absolute obedience even if a slave becomes your leader. Verily he among you who lives [long] will see great controversy, so you must keep to my sunnah and to the sunnah of the rightly-guided Khaleefahs - cling to them stubbornly. Beware of newly invented matters, for every invented matter is an innovation and every innovation is a going astray, and every going astray is in Hell-fire." [Abu Dawud and Al-Tirmidhi]

If we look back to the first Islamic State in Medina and the states of the Rightly Guided Khaleefahs we find those appointed to positions of authority were those who were strong in the Islamic ideology, and had the capability to rule i.e. they had a ruling mentality.

Those Muslims who before Islam were tribal leaders or from the ruling class already had this ruling mentality looking after the affairs of their tribe. An example is Mu'awiya, the sixth Khaleefah who before the conquest of Makkah was the crown prince primed for ruling Makkah after his father Abu Sufyan. Mu'awiya was appointed by Umar bin al-Khattab as governor of ash-sham (Syria, Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon) and remained in office until he took over the Khilafah from Imam Hasan.

The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said, "You will find people to be like mines. The best of them in the Jahiliyya (days of ignorance) are the best of them in Islam when they have understanding." [Bukhari, narrated by Abu Hurayra]

The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم also cultured the personalities of the sahaba and appointed them to positions of authority which developed their political experience. This political experience nurtured their ruling mentality and resulted in the sahaba becoming the future rulers once he صلى الله عليه وسلم had passed away. The sahaba were also the guarantors of the continued implementation of Islam even if they were not in government.

We can see this from the Rightly Guided Khaleefahs who were all Delegated Assistants (wazirs) at some point before becoming the Khaleefah. Abu Bakr and Umar were the wazirs for the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم. Umar was also the wazir when Abu Bakr was Khaleefah. Uthman and Ali were the wazirs when Umar was Khaleefah. Ali and Marwan ibn al-Hakam were the wazirs when Uthman was Khaleefah.

In addition to holding the posts of wazir the Rightly Guided Khaleefahs held other positions within the state. Abu Bakr, Umar and Ali were chosen by the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم to be the people of shura (consultation) and effectively formed part of the Shura Council (majlis ush-shura) in Medina.

"The Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم sent ‘Umar as responsible for sadaqah." [Bukhari & Muslim]

"When the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم returned back from the umrah of Ji'ranah, he sent Abu Bakr responsible for hajj." [Al-Nasa'i, reported by Ibn Khuzaymah and Ibn Hibban]

He صلى الله عليه وسلم appointed ‘Uthman Ibn ‘Affan as an ambassador to Quraysh during the Hudaybiyah Treaty affair.

He صلى الله عليه وسلم appointed ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib as a judge over Yemen, as secretary of agreements and peace treaties and commander of the Muslim army at different periods during his صلى الله عليه وسلم rule in Medina.

Khaleefah Umar ibn al-Khattab was very strict in ensuring he didn't resemble a King and that family ties would have no place in ruling. One day ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab said, "By Allah, I do not know whether I am a Khaleefah or a king, for if I am a king then this is a tremendous matter!" [Suyuti, History of the Khaleefahs]

When Umar was dying the Muslims came to him and requested him to assign a Khaleefah after him. One of the Muslims said to him: "Recommend your son ‘Abdullah." Umar said: "May Allah fight you, by Allah you did not seek Allah's pleasure by this opinion. Woe to you! How can I recommend a man who was unable to divorce his wife? There is no desire for us (family of Al-Khattab) in your affairs. I did not praise it (Khilafah) so as to like it to be for anyone from my family. If this matter (of Khilafah) was good then we have got our share. If it was bad then it is enough for family of ‘Umar that one person from them be accounted and be asked about the affairs of the Ummah of Muhammad. Really, I exerted myself and I deprived my family. If I managed to save myself sufficiently without sin and without reward, then I am happy."


Selection of rulers in the future Khilafah

A ruling mentality is something generic that may be exhibited in both Muslim and non-Muslim rulers and is developed through political experience whether this is gained in government or not.

As an example America is a capitalist ideological state. Its rulers would therefore be from people who are strong in the Capitalist ideology which primarily means links to large corporations. For example Dick Cheney, the former Vice-President was chairman of Halliburton and Michael Bloomberg, the current New York Mayor is the eighth richest in America. The bulk of election campaign funding is received from major corporations in all government elections whether they are Presidential, Mayoral or Congress elections.

US Presidents are selected from those with former political experience such as governors, Senators, Vice-Presidents or military generals. George Washington was a former Military General, George Bush Junior was a former governor of Texas and Barack Obama a former Senator.

Obama was in fact attacked during his election campaign for not having enough political experience since he was only a Senator for three years, compared to John McCain's long running political and military career. Obama used his grass-roots political work as a community organizer in Chicago as evidence of his political experience for the post of President.

Similarly a future Khilafah will choose rulers based on their ruling capability and strength of ideology as discussed previously. They will be those with a ruling mentality and political experience who have the skills to manage the affairs of state.

In practice this means the Khaleefah will be drawn from the pool of existing government posts. The Khaleefah may be a former governor, Ameer of Jihad, Delegated Assistant or Treasury Secretary with a wealth of political experience and well known to the ummah. As we saw with the Rightly Guided Khaleefahs it's likely the Khaleefah will always have served as a former Delegated Assistant.

For the other government posts the Khaleefah is free to choose whoever fulfils the contractual conditions of that post and is able to perform the task at hand. These posts may be filled by former university professors, military generals, newspaper editors, heads of political parties, tribal leaders, imams, members of the Regional Assemblies (Majlis ul-Wiliyah) and members of the Council of the Ummah (Majlis ul-Ummah).

In practice the majority of government posts will be drawn from the Majlis ul-Ummah since this is where the majority of politicians and statesman will be in the Khilafah.

A question arises, is it permissible for a member of the Majlis ul-Ummah to also be a member of the Khilafah government?

If we look back to the Prophet's صلى الله عليه وسلم state in Medina we find he صلى الله عليه وسلم appointed fourteen men for shura (consultation) because they were the representatives of their people. There were seven from the Muhajiroon and seven from the Ansar. These fourteen men effectively formed a Shura Council (Majlis ush-Shura). Among the members of this council were Abu Bakr and Umar. Abu Bakr and Umar were also Delegated Assistants in the Prophet's صلى الله عليه وسلم state so they held both positions, i.e. they were majlis members and rulers at the same time.

Therefore in a future Khilafah the state may adopt that Majlis Members can also be members of the government as we find in the UK where the elected representatives (MP's) hold a dual role as Ministers and even the Prime Minister. However, due to the expansion in the role of the Majlis and its importance as a counterbalance to the executive power of the Khaleefah and its cabinet, the best solution would be for the Majlis Member to resign his position when taking up a government post. This is what happens in America when a Senator or Congressman is selected for government.

 

Path to government

As mentioned above closing off ruling positions to an elite few is not permitted in Shari'a and can cause huge problems to the Khilafah's future stability. Therefore there needs to be a clear path to government and even the post of Khaleefah for any of the state's citizens with such aspirations. This will be done primarily through allowing the formation of numerous Islamic political parties, establishment of Regional Assemblies (Majlis ul-Wiliyah) in each province and the empowerment of a central Council of the Ummah (Majlis ul-Ummah) in the Khilafah's capital in the heart of government.

The scenario below attempts to illustrate this path.

Abdullah joins an Islamic political party in his youth. He is an activist of the party through his schooling and university. After completing university he pursues a full time career as an army officer in the Khilafah's army. He rises up the ranks and then decides on pursuing a full time political career. His political party put him forward as a candidate for the 5-yearly majlis elections. He campaigns and wins his seat. He then becomes a member of the Majlis ul-wiliyah and makes a strong impression on his constituency and the majlis. In the elections for his second term he gains enough votes for a seat on the Majlis ul-ummah in the Khilafah's capital. His work on some on the majlis committees impresses the Assistants (Mu'awinoon) who recommend his appointment to a government position. He works his way through various government posts finally becoming Foreign Affairs Secretary which is a cabinet position. From there he becomes a Delegated Assistant and when the Khaleefah unexpectedly dies he is shortlisted by the Majlis ul-Ummah for candidacy for the post of Khaleefah. His previous political and military experience wins over the Ummah who believe he can successfully manage their affairs and be the commander in chief of the armed forces. He gains the majority of votes during the election and becomes the Khaleefah.

Trackback(0)
Comments (28)add comment

Syed said:

REPLY..

Deriving hukm shara (Islamic rules) is a detailed science in Islam, and only for those who are qualified i.e. the mujtahideen (scholars).

Yes agreed.. But this pertains to the jurisprudence..means the acts of Islam but not the beliefs of Islam.. If you are going to believe that Allah is one because Someone of much greater knowledge asserts that same thing it, according to my thinking, will not be right.. Yes.. I need a mujtahid for differentiating sunnat and farz parts of salaat.. But as far as beliefs are concerned we have The Quran and the traditions and the intellect and the observation (mushahedaat) which serve the purpose.. Hope these arguments are sound..

We cannot read hadith in english and then derive a hukm (Islamic rule) bypassing the process of istinbat (method of extracting rules).

Agreed.!

Allah knows best.
Yes. Allah knows best.. But we are not to discard the quest of right knowledge by saying this.. We, common people, have started doing this lately... And the result is this that we devoid ourselves from finding out truth by our own efforts.. I suppose this is for those scholars of Islam who are sunk deep in the oceans of knowledge and yet they admit their incompetence (this is one way of submission to Allah's knowledge and the knowledge imparted by Allah to His beloved s.a.w.a).
Wassalaam.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
January 07, 2011
Votes: +1

Abdul-Kareem said:

RE: Syed,

Deriving hukm shara (Islamic rules) is a detailed science in Islam, and only for those who are qualified i.e. the mujtahideen (scholars).

We cannot read hadith in english and then derive a hukm (Islamic rule) bypassing the process of istinbat (method of extracting rules).

I am not a scholar but I follow the opinion of Sheikh Taqiudeen an-Nabahani who performed ijtihad on the topic of what are the contractual conditions for the Caliph. The daleel (evidence) for the condition of Qureysh is not decisive so this condition becomes one of recommendation rather than a wajib (obligation). I have quoted this ijtihad below taken from the book Nizam ul-Hukm fil-Islam (text in bold).

On the issue of qureysh being a condition for the Caliph there is ikhtilaaf (difference of opinion) among the scholars. Some scholars did put this as a condition because for them the evidence was decisive. But as I said the strongest opinion in my view is that its not a contractual condition, but as with any issue of ikhtilaaf the opinion may be wrong. Allah knows best.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
January 07, 2011
Votes: +0

Syed said:

i am not at all influenced by any school of thought.. but i know that truth is always hidden.and its not easy to explore it..this is very much evident in Islamic history..and i am in search of that truth..by discourses and discussions..in the light of the Holy Quran and the sahih traditions.... May Allah help me...and help all muslim brothers and sisters who exert without any prejudice or pre conceived notions..
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
January 07, 2011
Votes: +0

Syed said:

I am not able to post a direct reply to what you say, so I am writing as a separate comment..

I quote all of them again.. And this time please read it as the words of the Prophet of Allah s.a.w.a who is not guided by fancies (maza Allah). What he says is according to the will of Allah.

1. This Caliphate WILLnot end until there have been twelve Caliphs among them. The narrator said: Then he (the Holy Prophet) said something that I could not follow. I said to my father: What did he say? He said: He has said: All of them will be from the Quraish.

2. The Caliphate WILL REMAIN among the Quraish even if only two persons are left (on the earth).

3. The affairs of the people WILL CONTINUE TO BE CONDUCTED (WELL) as long as they are GOVERNED by TWELVE MEN.

Now I quote u.

"This does not mean there cannot be more than 12 Caliphs or Caliphs who are not from Qureysh. We know there were more than 12 Caliphs and the Ottomans were not from Qureysh. "

my arguments: the first part of this statement is a direct negation of Prophet of Mankind or I should say..the negation of WAMA YANTAQO ANIL HAWA and the second part of what you say is just a historical fact.. Yes there were.. But when Prophet of Islam says about the numbers what I have qouted with ayat....then we should look from the Quraiysh who constantly claimed that it was them who wee prophesized by the prophet to be the Islamic leaders and divine succesors of the divine Prophet s.a.w.a. The second part of ur argument also means that we (muslims) believe history to be our religious guide rather than the traditions of the Prophet and the will of Allah..swt

Something is wrong somewhere in our approach.. Dont you feel that..?

again I quote u..

'The condition of being from Qureysh is a recommended condition and not a contractual condition."

what is the basis of this imposed logic....?
Quran and traditions say.. Accept what The Prophet gives you and refrain from what he orders you to refrain from..

Quote: These and other Ahadith, proved sound and related to the Messenger of Allah (saw) that the authority is amongst the people of Quraysh, they have actually come in an informative form and not an imperative one. Not one Hadith actually carries a command even though they carry a request. Such a request, however, is not a conclusive command because there is no evidence to qualify them for this. No Hadith has been linked to any connotation (Qareena) that makes it a conclusive command, which indicates that it is Mandub (desirable) and not obligatory. It is, therefore a condition of preference and not a contractual condition...

Dont you, after having so much awareness about history and logic (what we are are taught and also what we are not taught), feel that this is in non confirmity with the mission of the Prophet, Divine Conscience and even our common sense..

And he alone guides whom he wishes.

Wassalaam.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
January 07, 2011
Votes: +0

Abdul-Kareem said:

RE: Syed

All the hadith you have quoted are informative and do no contain an order to do something or refrain from something (amr). When the Prophet (saw) said there will be 12 Caliphs from Qureysh, this does not mean there cannot be more than 12 Caliphs or Caliphs who are not from Qureysh. We know there were more than 12 Caliphs and the Ottomans were not from Qureysh.

The condition of being from Qureysh is a recommended condition and not a contractual condition. The full ijtihad and explanation of the Islamic evidences including one of the hadiths you quoted (4476) is below. This is taken from the book Nizam ul-Hukm fil-Islam (Ruling System in Islam) by Hizb ut-Tahrir.


The Khaleefah does not also necessarily have to be from Quraysh. As for what has been reported by Al-Bukhari from Mu’awiya that he said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (saw) say:

“Verily this matter (amr) is within Quraysh. As long as they implemented the Deen, if anyone were hostile to them, Allah would throw him on his face.”

And what Al-Bukhari narrated on the authority of Ibnu ‘Umar that he said: The Messenger of Allah (saw) said:

“This matter would still be within Quraysh even if only two of them remained.”

These and other Ahadith, proved sound and related to the Messenger of Allah (saw) that the authority is amongst the people of Quraysh, they have actually come in an informative form and not an imperative one. Not one Hadith actually carries a command even though they carry a request. Such a request, however, is not a conclusive command because there is no evidence to qualify them for this. No Hadith has been linked to any connotation (Qareena) that makes it a conclusive command, which indicates that it is Mandub (desirable) and not obligatory. It is, therefore a condition of preference and not a contractual condition.

As for Allah’s Messenger (saw) saying:

“if anyone were hostile to them, Allah would throw him on his face.”

This indicates prohibition of being hostile to them and not confirmation to his saying:

“this matter is within Quraysh.”

The Hadith says that the matter (ruling) is within them, and it then proceeds to forbid hostility to them.

Besides, the word Quraysh is a name and not a description. In Shari’ah terminology it is known as a title. And the meaning derived from the title is never considered, because the title has no meaning (Mafhoom) at all.

Therefore, the mention of Quraysh does not mean that the position of ruling cannot belong to other than Quraysh. So when Allah’s Messenger
(saw) said:

“Verily this matter is within Quraysh...” and his saying:

“This matter would still be within Quraysh...”

He (saw) did not mean that it is wrong for it (the ruling) to be in other than Quraysh. He (saw) meant that it is within Quraysh and, as well, it is valid to be in the hands of others who are not from Quraysh. Thus specifying the people of Quraysh as rulers does not necessarily mean that others are not valid to rule.

Therefore, it is a condition of preference and not a contractual condition.

Indeed the Messenger of Allah (saw) appointed ‘Abdullah Ibn Ruwahah, Zayd Ibnu Harith and Usama Ibnu Zayd to positions of authority and all three were not from Quraysh. Thus the Messenger of Allah (saw) did appoint people from other than Quraysh to positions of ruling. In this phrase “this matter” (Amr), means the authority, i.e. the authority to rule, and this does not only apply to the post of Khilafah. The fact that the Messenger of Allah (saw) did appoint people from outside Quraysh in posts of authority indicates that authority is not exclusively confined to the people of Quraysh, and prevented from others. Therefore, the Ahadith have mentioned some of the people who are worthy of the Khilafah post, to indicate their preference and do not indicate that it is exclusively confined to them or prohibited for other than them.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
January 06, 2011
Votes: +0

Syed said:

pls explain..in detail about the traditions for the benefit of all.. (if u publish after reviewing) and guide me if the references are weak or wrong..

Wassallam.
Syed.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
January 06, 2011
Votes: +0

Syed said:

Khilafat in Quraish from Sahi Muslim :

1. Book 20, Number 4477:

It has been narrated on the authority of Jabir b. Samura who said: I joined the company of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) with my father and I heard him say: This Caliphate will not end until there have been twelve Caliphs among them. The narrator said: Then he (the Holy Prophet) said something that I could not follow. I said to my father: What did he say? He said: He has said: All of them will be from the Quraish.

2. Book 20, Number 4476:

It has been narrated on the authority of 'Abdullah that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: The Caliphate will remain among the Quraish even if only two persons are left (on the earth),

3. Book 20, Number 4477:

It has been narrated on the authority of Jabir b. Samura who said: I joined the company of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) with my father and I heard him say: This Caliphate will not end until there have been twelve Caliphs among them. The narrator said: Then he (the Holy Prophet) said something that I could not follow. I said to my father: What did he say? He said: He has said: All of them will be from the Quraish.

____________________

4. Book 20, Number 4478:

It has been reported on the authority of Jabir b. Samura who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say: The affairs of the people will continue to be conducted (well) as long as they are governed by twelve men. Then the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) said words which were obscure to me. I asked my father: What did the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say? He said: All of the (twelve men) will be from the Quraish.

5. Book 20, Number 4483:

It has been narrated on the authority of Amir b. Sa'd b. Abu Waqqas who said: I wrote (a letter) to Jabir b. Samura and sent it to him through my servant Nafi', asking him to inform me of something he had heard from the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him). He wrote to me (in reply): I heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say on Friday evening, the day on which al-Aslami was stoned to death (for committing adultery): The Islamic religion will continue until the Hour has been established, or you have been ruled over by twelve Caliphs, all of them being from the Quraish. also heard him say: A small force of the Muslims will capture the white palace, the police of the Persian Emperor or his descendants. I also heard him say: Before the Day of Judgment there will appear (a number of) impostors. You are to guard against them. I also heard him say: When God grants wealth to any one of you, he should first spend it on himself and his family (and then give it in charity to the poor). I heard him (also) say: I will be your forerunner at the Cistern (expecting your arrival).

 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
January 06, 2011
Votes: +0

ta said:

salaam, any position of power however small could be abused by the enemies of islam / khilafah. ie insider troublemakers.
How are we going to avoid this, i think we should start advertising the jobs now, and weed out all these spies and agents.
Actualy the best thing is for HT brothers and other islamic groups should start making a government in exile, and publish this.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
October 26, 2010
Votes: -1

Duha AL-Ghamdi said:

Though i'm not taking a apart in breaking the borders (nationallism)
but i'd let my name listed among the suporters

I know Khilafah is the solution.
Stand united to bring a revolution.

Save my sisters and brothers in Islam,
And release them from goantanay and balgram.

Wipe the tears of Afia’s mother,
And set a state for obsessed sisters and brothers.

To know Khilafah is Muslilm’s dignity,
In Khilafah is our integrity.

Weak up; o’ you who forgot your past
And let innocents killed in blasts.

Stand to establish Khilafah again,
To taste the sweet bear the pain.

Bihublillah, all are bound
On the earth or under the ground.,

Glorify Him only, animals and birds.
Pay some heed to Prophet’s (pbuh) words.

No matter what, you have to fight.
Keep struggling, day and night.

Your efforts won't go in vain.
Allah will bring sunshine after the rain.







 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
August 10, 2010
Votes: +3

Hassan said:

What would happen to the regional languages?We should not forget that people tend to take pride in their mother tongues and their literature.

Though I do not believe in regionalism or ethnic nationalism,i understand that the act of making Arabic the sole state language shall serve to alienate the non-Arab masses....and they shall continue to be alienated till they fully adopt Arabic and that could take a while.

English should be a co-official language as the intelligentsia of almost all Muslim countries is fluent in English.Also,local administration should be conducted in the local languages till such a time the people achieve fluency in Arabic.

Also,will the proposed republic be a federation or a unitary state?

The argument in favor of a unitary state is that Muslims are one nation and so do not need such arrangements.

The arguments against are that ethnic and linguistic nationalism is strong amongst many Muslims.The proponants of such kinds of nationalism are etho-centric politicans who are trying to break Muslim countries into smaller countries.
Furthermore,historical precedence shows us that several autonomous sub-national entities closely resembling federating units existed in the Islamic empires of old.

Furthermore I should state here that the the institution that we now call the 'ulema' is no longer the scholarly class of old.There must be a method to transition the Muslim Ummah into a meritocracy and a proper method should be devised for the meritocratic selection of members of the Ulema....so as to prevent the rather hypocritical players in the field from becoming members.....who tend to align themselves with political powers and allow religion to be exploited for political gains...
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 30, 2010
Votes: +0

Rooh said:

Rooh hugs brother Abdul Kareem for his patience and reply...

JazakAllah Khair Akhi
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 14, 2010
Votes: +0

Abdul-Kareem said:

RE: Rooh

You did not answer the question if a leader could rely on another person for Arabic communication?

Arabic is the language of the state which means everyone will have to learn Arabic at some point. Those in ruling positions will have to learn Arabic although it’s not a shar'i condition as far as I am aware even for the Khaleefah since the rulers can make use of translators and secretaries.

Even though the official language of the Khilafah is Arabic this does not mean the State could not use other than the Arabic language, for it is permitted for the State to use in an official correspondence other than the Arabic language, either for fear of distortion, or to acquire vital information or to convey the Da’awah abroad or for any similar reason. This is mentioned in the book "Muqadimat ad-dustur" which explains each article of Hizb ut-Tahrir's adopted constitution for the Khilafah.

The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم had translators and secretaries for handling letters and other languages.

Al-Bayhaqi narrated from Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (ra) that he said: “A letter from a man came to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم, so he said to Abdullah ibn Al-Arqam, “Reply on my behalf.” He wrote his reply and then read it to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم. He صلى الله عليه وسلم said “You did what is right and proficient.” (May Allah give him success).

Al-Bukhari mentioned in his Saheeh that the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم ordered Zayd ibn Thabit to learn the language of the Jews so as to read to the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم when they wrote to him. So Zayd ibn Thabit learnt Hebrew in fifteen days.

It is assuming that all the institutions of Khilafah are setup and running...

The above article is describing the situation of rulers once the Khilafah is well established and stable. It’s not dealing with the immediate situation now and how the Khilafah in its early years will function and select rulers.

Until the Khilafah is well established and stable there will no elections and no elected Majlis ul-Ummah in its final form, even the first Khaleefah will be contracted by those who gave the nusra (support) to him. However, there should be some sort of Majlis containing the influentials in society (ahl hali wal aqd) and representatives of all the schools of thought, political parties and Islamic groups to make the state an inclusive state not the monopoly of one section of Muslims. This is a temporary situation that is necessary to transform the society to dar al-Islam. Once the Khilafah is established and stable and the electoral processes are in place, then the Khaleefah may decide to voluntarily step down (although he is not obliged to) so the Ummah can vote for a candidate of their choice.

Can there be advisors to the Caliph who are unelected and not in the Majlis Ul Ummah?

Yes. The Quranic verse on shura "And do consult them in the matter." [3:159] is general and therefore the Khaleefah does not only have to consult elected representatives. The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not restrict himself only to the senior sahaba who made up the Majlis ush-Shura in Medina.

Every government has appointed advisors who are unelected such as political and military advisors and the Khilafah will be no different.

However, in those matters of shura where the opinion of the Majlis is binding such as the practical matters of legislation then advisors outside the Majlis would play no role in these areas.

Does the majority always selects the best people as representatives?

Not necessarily, because people are human beings prone to error. However, they must still be the ones who choose their own representatives. This is explained further in the book "Institutions of State in the Khilafah". An extract addressing your point is below.

The Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم did not choose those whom he consulted based on their ability, competence and personalities; rather he chose them based on two points:

Firstly, because they were chiefs among their folks, regardless of their ability and competence; secondly, because they represented the Muhajireen and the Ansar. The reason for the presence of the people of the Shura is to represent the people. Therefore the tenet upon which the Ummah's Council members are chosen should be: the representation of people, as was the case in the deliberate selection from the chiefs, and the representation of the groups as was the case in the deliberate selection from the Muhajireen and the Ansar. This representation of the individuals and groups who are uncounted cannot be achieved except by election. The members of the Ummah's Council have to therefore be elected.

As for the fact that it was the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم, himself, who chose whom he consulted, this was because the area in question, Medina, was small and because the Muslims were known to him. In contrast, in the second Bayah of Al-Aqaba, the Muslims who gave him the Bayah were not known to him and this is why he left the matter of choosing the chiefs to them, by saying:

"Choose from among you twelve leaders who will be responsible for themselves and their people." As reported in the Seerah of Ibn Hisham from Kaab b. Malik.

We can thus conclude from the fact that the members of the Ummah's Council represent the opinion of the Muslims at large, and since the reason (‘Illah) for which the Council is founded is to represent the individuals and groups in voicing their opinions and in holding the rulers accountable, and since this cannot be achieved if the persons were not known, unless there was a general election. All of this proves that the members of the Ummah's Council should be elected and not appointed.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 14, 2010
Votes: +1

Rooh said:

AA.

@ghazi

Your point about learning Arabic is valid... However I totally disagree with the idea that only Arabs can understand Islam properly... It may have been true in the past but in this day and age there has been so much material translated in languages like Urdu, Farsi, Turkish and now even in English... To understand Islam and to grasp its political concepts is no longer a study in Arabic language...

However one cannot perform ijtihad without knowing Arabic... but interestingly enough... one may perform a completely wrong ijtihad despite knowing Arabic...

So far I can understand the following uses of Arabic...

1. To be able to sense the Miracle of Quran in its language directly... thus stronger in Imaan (but this is not necessary. There are Arabs who are Kuffar and Arabs who have become Murtad after being Muslim)
2. To be able to do ijtihaad... (again Arabs have made serious mistakes in this despite knowing Arabic)
3. To be able to communicate with the Ummah as a large population of the Muslim Ummah speaks and understands Arabic... This was where I was trying to employ an Arab as my secretary... :)

Brothers and sisters... remember this... I m not trying to downplay the importance of Arabic and actually it would be enough for the Hizb to order something and for me to accept it... but this discussion is important so that there be no impression that the Hizb is some sort of an "Arab" experiment...

JazakAllah Khair... Now who will vote for me for the Majlis Ul Ummah... If you elect me... I promise I ll learn Arabic and fire my secretary :)
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 14, 2010
Votes: +3

Abdul-Kareem said:

RE: Muslim

wa salam.

What were the circumstances at the time of Bai'ah of Abu Bakr? Wasn't the Ummah in unanimous agreement about the appointment of him to the Khilafah?

After the death of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم some of the sahaba met in the saqeefah of Bani Saidah, to choose the next Khaleefah. There were four candidates nominated through the discussion - Sa'd ibn Ubadah, Umar, Abu Bakr and Abu Ubaydah. After discussion they decided to contract the bay'ah to Abu Bakr. It was unanimous for all those in attendance at the saqeefah except Sa'd who abstained. However, the other sahaba such as Ali bin Abi Talib and the rest of the Muslims in the Arabian Peninsula played no role in contracting the bay'ah to Abu Bakr and its not a sharia condition for them to do so since the contracting of the bay'ah is fard al-kifiya (see below).

If everyone in the Ummah was unanimous about the appointment of Abu Bakr as the Khalifah then it follows that everyone in the Ummah must be in agreement about the appointment of future Khalifs.

This is not correct.

The bay'ah is a contract based on mutual consent and choice on both sides, i.e. for the Khaleefah to accept the job and the Ummah to give their allegience.

Those eligible to appoint the Khaleefah are not a specific group of people; rather this right belongs to all Muslims without exception, even to a fasiq, so long as they are mature Muslims. This is because the relevant texts came in a general form, nothing else has been reported to restrict them except the rejection of the Bay’ah of the child who is under the age of maturity, and therefore they remain general in their scope.

Contracting the bay'ah to a Khaleefah is fard al-Kifiyah (collective obligation) and not an individual obligation (Fard ‘Ayn). Accordingly, if some of the Muslims performed it the rest of the Ummah would be exempted.

Nevertheless, the whole of the Ummah should be enabled to exercise their right of appointing the Khaleefah, regardless of whether they utilised this right or not. In other words, every Muslim should be able to participate in appointing the Khaleefah, by genuinely enabling him to do so. Therefore not every Muslim needs to be involved in contracting the bay'ah to the Khaleefah.

Majority of votes sounds like Democracy, the same flawed system that allows for rigging of elections.

Although the sahaba never used the style of voting in electing the Khulufa Rashida this doesn't mean voting for a Khaleefah is not allowed.

The sharia rule automatically includes all actions that branch out from the original rule unless there is another text relating to a subsidiary action.

For example Allah (swt) orders us to pay zakat. "And pay out the Zakat" [73:20]. Then the evidences came regarding the subsidiary actions which branched out from it, such as the amount of Nisab, the Zakat collectors and the categories of people from whom Zakat is to be taken. All these are actions derived from the ayah, "And pay out the Zakat".

There are no evidences to be found about the manner by which the Zakat collectors have to collect the Zakah. For example do they go riding or walking? Do they hire other employees to help them or not? Do they collect it according to records? Do they have to establish headquarters where they would all meet? Would they have warehouses where they would store everything they had collected? Would these houses be underground or built like grain houses? Would the cash Zakat be collected in bags or coffers? All these actions and the like are, in fact, subsidiary actions originating from "And pay out the Zakat."

They are all covered by the general evidence as there are no specific evidences for them; and this is the case with all the styles.

Thus, the style is an action subsidiary to an action i.e. the origin that has general evidence. Therefore, the style does not require evidence, because the evidence of its origin serves as evidence for it as well.

With regards voting. This is simply a style used to implement the sharia rule of enabling the ummah to exercise their right in appointing the Khaleefah.

When Umar bin al-Khattab died a council was formed containing the candidates for the next Khaleefah. Abdul Rahman ibn Awf withdrew himself as a candidate and then asked the rest of the group who they wanted as Khaleefah. Their answer was confined to two: Ali and ‘Uthman. Then Abdul-Rahman sought the opinion of the Muslims regarding the two people and which they would elect as Khalifah. He asked the men and women when investigating the opinion of the people. He (ra) worked day and night during the period of electing the Khalifah.

Al-Bukhari reported from Al-Miswar ibn Makhramah that he said: “Abdul Rahman knocked at my door after a part of the night passed till I woke up. He said, ‘I see you have been sleeping. By Allah, I did not enjoy much sleep in these three’”, meaning the three nights.

After the people had prayed the dawn prayer (fajr), the Bayah was concluded to ‘Uthman and he became Khalifah by the bayah of the Muslims, and not due to the nomination of the six people by ‘Umar.

Abdul Rahman ibn Awf used the style of asking the majority of Muslims in Medina who they wanted as Khaleefah and we will use the style of voting. Both styles are based on the same sharia rule and achieve the same result i.e. the election of the Khaleefah.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 14, 2010
Votes: +1

Yusuf said:

Salam.
I liked zs article a lot, very interesting, clear, enlightening, whoever is he I liked his style, his vision and his consistency. Thanks for sending it. From 17 emails I rcvd tod this was z only article I chose to read bec of yr insistence! God bless him he made z khaleefah rule as living in heaven, I thought I and a martyr, who was a companion in our kifah, were z only two to imagine Islamic rule as such! Alhamdillah.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 14, 2010
Votes: +1

mughal said:

. The problem is who is voting for whom. Even in a local council, who actually knows the person he/she is voting for? Most people will never have met the candidate, never have had dealings with him, and therefore not really know anything about his character. The information they will get will be that which will have been provided to them by the respective political party.

Bro, Islamic states media would be true unlike the Western Media. They will supply the true information and will never be biased. In democracy the elite group manipulate the public opinion because the media is owned by few elite multi billionaires who want to coerce their opinion on the masses. If ur not aware of how media manipulates public opinion then u can search documentaries of Hizb ut tahrir . Or also Some other grup who is against the media mind control and lies. On the contrary the media of the Islamic state will not be owned by few elite billionaires but by the govnt to ensure that they are telling the truth to the masses. Islamic Intelligence agencies will play important role in this too.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 14, 2010
Votes: +1

ghazi said:

Assalamualaikum, thank you for such enlightening article as well as the discussion that follows.

@ Rooh

Regarding the Arabic language, i don't think it would be an issue, as language is something that can be learned. So, even the potential leaders among Muslims in the non Arabic speaking world can still stand a chance to offer themselves to serve the ummah as their leaders - as long as they are willing to learn Arabic. Of which I think should be made compulsory, particularly to those who are becoming our leaders in the future khilafah. Not only because Arabic will become the state language, but also because mastery in Arabic is one of the criteria to become a mujtahid.

Khalifah would be the policy maker of the state after consulting other state apparatus such as Majlis Ummah. So, in order to make sure that every policy is in accordance to the syariah, one should master the tools for extracting the hukm from Al-Quran, as-Sunnah, ijma us Sahabah and qiyas. The tools includes the mastery of Arabic and a few other criteria.

AFAIK, it is preferable for a Caliph to be the mujtahid. Do right me if I'm wrong.

P/s: Perhaps we should all start learning Arabic from now on. Not just because of this, but also for our own goodness - so that we can understand Islam better. It is because most of the invaluable resources of Islam is in Arabic.And the most important source would be Al-Quran and as-Sunnah - of which both are originally in Arabic.

Wallahua'lam...
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 13, 2010
Votes: +0

Muslim said:

As-Salamu 'Alaykum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh:

What were the circumstances at the time of Bai'ah of Abu Bakr? Wasn't the Ummah in unanimous agreement about the appointment of him to the Khilafah?

Majority of votes sounds like Democracy, the same flawed system that allows for rigging of elections.

If everyone in the Ummah was unanimous about the appointment of Abu Bakr as the Khalifah then it follows that everyone in the Ummah must be in agreement about the appointment of future Khalifs.

 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 13, 2010
Votes: +0

Rooh said:

Abdul Kareem Akhi... You did not answer the question if a leader could rely on another person for Arabic communication? It is important because there are talented people in the Ummah who unfortunately do not speak Arabic and a strict "only Arab speaking leaders" will leave serious holes in making use of that untapped potential... Perhaps I m ignorant but other than the leadership of the Hizb and the Hizb's Arab members (which we do not know directly or how many they are), the Arab world has serious problems and is simply unable to lead anyone towards the goals of Islam...

There is another problem with the above scenario... It is assuming that all the institutions of Khilafah are setup and running... This scenrio cannot work for the initial phase of the new Islamic State as there are no institutions to ensure such a smooth functioning of the required departments etc...

Lastly even if the Khilafah has its institutions setup and working... Does the majority always selects the best people as representatives? Today we have the situation that the majority of Muslims lack proper culture, insight and vision of the aims of Islam in general and in detail... Despite what we would like to believe, people still do support and vote for all sorts of corrupt indiviiduals in power... There are nil political parties (except the hizb) which would consider Khilafah as first priority and some of the Islamic parties actually support Democracy... Furthermore a man may be very popular in the electorate thru social skills and using his money etc, but lack any understanding of the realities of the Dunya...

Can there be advisors to the Caliph who are unelected and not in the Majlis Ul Ummah?

I m posing all these questions because at times its easier to ask here instead of contacting brothers in Hizb for their opinions...

JazakAllah Khair
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 13, 2010
Votes: +1

Abdul-Kareem said:

RE: Slave of Allah

HT has undertaken itjihad based on the detailed Islamic evidences which permit elections as a style for selecting the Khaleefah and the Majlis Members. This is elaborated further in the book Ajhizat Dowlatul-Khilafah. http://www.khilafah.com/images...jhizah.pdf

Regarding the point about the masjids this is no different to what is being said in the article. The statesmen and politicians must be strong in the ideology which means they have taqwa, are strong in Islamic culture and their salah. Many of them may be Imam’s in their local masjids already but this is not a condition. They will be representatives of the Ummah already due to their involvement in community issues even if they haven’t been elected to government. This is what we saw in the senior sahaba and the Tabieen who the Khaleefah’s used to consult with for advice even though they held no formal government positions in the Umayyad period.

In fact classical scholars mention that the Khaleefah and his deputies should read salatul-jumah. So in a city it would be the Amil (Mayor) and in a town it would be the Hakim. Therefore leading the salah and holding government positions are intrinsically linked in sharia already.

On the second point regarding information available to voters. This has been heavily debated among the western political philosophers. In today’s information age knowing the candidate and his view is readily available to any voter. I don’t see this as a problem.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 12, 2010
Votes: +0

Slave of Allah said:

Reading this article suggests to me that HT feels that the method to choose leaders from the local level to the Khilafah is through elections. There is nothing wrong with the concept of elections per se, but who will elect and how? If HT feels that local leaders will be chosen in the same way local councils are elected, and Khilafahs will be elected the same way the President of say the US is elected, then I would strongly urge the Ulama of HT to reconsider this position. The electoral process of these two are the same. One or more candidates is nominated, and a good number of people vote for their chosen candidate, and someone becomes the successful candidate. The problem with this system is not the voting (as long as in an Islamic state it is clear that only adult, sane, Muslims can vote). The problem is who is voting for whom. Even in a local council, who actually knows the person he/she is voting for? Most people will never have met the candidate, never have had dealings with him, and therefore not really know anything about his character. The information they will get will be that which will have been provided to them by the respective political party. What, then, is the value of this election? A second point to note: can the restored Khilafah survive even one day if the Ummah fails to attend the five daily prayers in the Masjid? But it must be clear that the Masjid is the focal point of the life of the Ummah. The Imam of the Masjid should really be the man with the greatest taqwa, great learning, great leadership skills. If the community is based around the masjid, then you automatically get the person best thought of in the community to lead, as he will be the person chosen to lead the prayer This is because any visitor to that masjid will naturally wish ardently that his prayers be led by the best among them. This is certainly an election, and the elected individual will deal with the problems of the community. Problems affecting an area comprising more than one masjid will be dealt with by the imams and maybe some other people of those areas, who will naturally elect from among themselves a leader, especially when the time for prayer should fall due during their meetings. This process is extensible to include the whole wilayah, and ultimately the Khilafah. Obviously, the Ahl al Hall wal Aqd would be the people of power and responsibility at each level of this system. The beauty of this system is that at each tier, the people involved in the electoral process would know the person they are voting for by mutual interaction. I think a proper evaluation of the process of election of the Khilafah at the time of the Rashidun khilafah will support this method. We must remember that the Sahabah were told by the Messenger (saw) to attend the masjid for prayer in jamaat, and they were very strict in their practise of this. To go for the current system of voting with political campaigns, electoral speeches (which promise the earth and deliver only dust) is probably wrong.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 12, 2010
Votes: +3

H Khan said:


@ Mohammed Naseer:...


"AA Br Abdul Kareem - Is there an urdu version of this article or if you could ask around please wether one exists, jzk - WS, Naseer. "


As far as MY understanding in regards to the Urdu-speaking diasporas, any one of them who is in any position of Political influence and Material Power, are adept in the English language, and are more than qualified to understand this article - if it were brought to their attention.


So please do pass it on to your intended ‘target audience’, and gain the reward; for if any of them are 'inspired' by this article to remove the present despotic regimes in our lands with a view to replacing it with the Khilafah, then you will indeed have immense reward for it - a promise fro Allah (swt).

Insh'Allah.

 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 12, 2010
Votes: +0

Abdul-Kareem said:

RE: Mohammed Naseer

Wa salam,

I don't know Urdu I'm afraid so there is no urdu translation of this article.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 12, 2010
Votes: +0

Abdul-Kareem said:

RE: hasanhh

Wa salam,

Where is the role of al-Qaim/Hojjatallah in this?

I'm sorry I dont understand the question. Can you please elaborate on what you mean by al-Qaim/Hojjatallah?
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 12, 2010
Votes: +0

Abdul-Kareem said:

RE: Rooh

Wa salam,

You are right there are other qualities the rulers must have such as Arabic. There are also other contractual conditions and preferential conditions. However, this article is focussing on a more general area of political experience, ideology and the ruling mentality.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 12, 2010
Votes: +0

Mohammed Naseer said:

AA Br Abdul Kareem - Is there an urdu version of this article or if you could ask around please wether one exists, jzk - WS, Naseer.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 12, 2010
Votes: +0

hasanhh said:

Assalamallikum,
Just tonight heard of HTA an read your site.
In this article on administrative capacity and political judgement, you discuss personal requirements. All of which are "correct", but I have one question: Where is the role of al-Qaim/Hojjatallah in this?

H.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 11, 2010
Votes: +0

Rooh said:

AA.

You are missing an important point which is that leaders of the Ummah have to know Arabic since Arabic is the state's language. This is what I think is the Hizb's opinion in this matter.

I do wonder if a non Arab could be in a leading role without knowing Arabic. Can someone like that not use a secretary who knows Arabic to handle communication?
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 11, 2010
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy