Khilafah.com

Wednesday
Feb 08th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Q&A: The Coup in Niger

E-mail Print PDF

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Question:

Military Sources in Niger announced on Thursday, 18th February that soldiers led by Major Adam Haroun staged a military coup against President Mohammed Tanja and declared that the president and members of government have been detained at a place in the vicinity of the presidential palace in the capital Niami. They also announced the suspension of the constitution and dissolution of all governmental establishments. Is this military coup similar to others coups in the past in Niger which have been due to local conflicts between the influential French agents in this former French colony, or is it a reflection of an international conflict? May Allah reward you!

Answer:

Yes, indeed this military coup has taken place as you have mentioned, and they have declared formation of a 'Higher Council of Restoration of Democracy' under the chairmanship of Salo Jeebo, the commander of the Support Unit in Niami which includes heavy armours like battle tanks. The Council stated: "The government stands dissolved, and the 'Higher Council of Restoration of Democracy' advises the people that general matters have been delegated to the directors general of various ministries and provinces." [Reuters/AFP: 19.02.2010].

To better understand the event, we present the following indicators:

1. The French news agency AFP announced that an unnamed French official had earlier informed it: "A military coup is imminent in Niger and that Tanja is not in a very good position." AFP added that this French diplomat mentioned to it that: "The Presidential Guard participated in the coup." He explained: "We are aware that a division of the armed forces opposed to Tanja and have imposed themselves in violation of the constitutional directives, but we believe that they are a handful minority." He said: "There has been a history of military coup in this country, but we did not believe that it would be staged with such speed." The Prime Minister of Niger Ali Bajo Ghamani had on Wednesday, i.e. a day prior to the coup called an important meeting of the cabinet of ministers.

2. This indicates that France was not expecting this military coup against its agent Mohammed Tanja to take place this quickly although it was aware about the presence of such military soldiers but it presumed that they were an ineffective minority who were not in a position to stage a coup. France was undertaking negotiations with them in an attempt to resolve the situation in order to avoid a coup, but it did nevertheless take place. Also the Niger government was aware of the challenge to it and it, along with its supporter France wanted to solve the issues that threatened it. But the soldiers surprised both the Niger government as well as France.

3. France had expressed its displeasure over the coup and it was executed despite this. The French Foreign Ministry spokesman said: "France condemns any unconstitutional takeover of authority and calls for dialogue between the rebels and the president.'' [Free American Channel: 19.02.2010]. This statement of the French spokesman reiterates that France was opposed to the rebels and wants dialogue to restore the deposed president, which implies that the coup was staged against France.

4. The French news agency A.F.P on 19th February, 2010 quoted an unnamed American official in Washington saying: "Indeed he [Tanja] has no one to blame for the coup but himself.'' A.F.P and other news agencies also carried another report on the same day that the US State Department spokesman Phillip Crowley had stated: "This is difficult situation, President Tanja was trying to extend his term. And clearly this prompted today's events.'' He said: "We believe this emphasises that Niger should work to hold elections and form a new government.''

5. The statements of the US official not named by the French news agency and the statements of the US State Department Spokesman indicate that the coup is acceptable to the US and it hold the deposed president Tanja responsible for it. This was implied in the reference to Tanja attempt to extend his term by three years through a referendum held last August to effect changes in the constitution. The opposition forces had then opposed the move and the political situation in the country had become tense. Tanja had been elected twice after the coup carried out by troops led by Brigadier Dawood Malaam Wanki in 1999. The constitution of Niger does not allow a third term for a candidate and hence it was amended. He had dissolved the Constitutional Court because it did not ratify the amendment which allowed him a third term or extend his term of office. Similarly, Tanja had dissolved the parliament on 26th May, last after which parliamentary elections were held November last which were won by the opposition.

America's reference to the extension of term is it to lay responsibility on the president and thereby justify the military coup. Also the US State Department Spokesman did not call for either restoration of the deposed president nor for dialogue between the rebels and the deposed president. Instead he called for holding of fresh elections and forming a new government. All this indicates that the US is behind the coup.

6. It is known that Niger is an Islamic country and a majority of its people are Muslims. It was a French colony under its direct rule and was given nominal independence in the year 1960, but the French influence continued there in all spheres. Even today there are 1500 French to protect its nuclear interests, since Niger is third largest producer of Uranium in the world and it is the French companies that have invested in Uranium production. This is why the US is eyeing it with greed in order to exercise control over it and remove French influence there as well as in other African nations, most of which are Islamic and are rich in many natural resources that provide raw materials of various types as well as energy resources. This is why it has been the bone of contention for the greedy European and American colonialists.

7. Due to Niger's importance as a Uranium producer, especially since it is financed by the French companies, it is unlikely that Americans will gain access there so easily and France is not likely to abandon its colony without resisting the US. Hence the next few days are going to witness a hot international conflict in this Muslim land which are different to what Niger has hitherto witnessed between various French agents.


6th Rabee' ul Awwal, 1431 A.H
20th February, 2010 C.E

The above is a draft translation from Arabic.

Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add comment

Adnan said:

Their is friction between France and the US, both are competing for their interests globally, which means they clash constantly. But both feel allowing this to reach boiling point and spill over into a conflict would not be good for both as it would exhaust both.

Also such states believe that competition in one part of the world doesn’t means they cannot cooperate in another part of the world. So France works with the US over Iran’s nuclear programme and North Koreas nuclear programme but works against the US in Sudan and Lebanon. For France this it what it believes serves its interests the best.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
March 26, 2010
Votes: +0

Tim said:

Salaam,

I have a question about the article:

France openly opposes against the coup and condems it, while the U.S. most likely lead the coup d'etat.
So how come there isn't any friction between France and the U.S.?

Apart from the few spelling errors, good article it clarified a lot for me.

Jazzik Allah.


Salaam,

T. Farid


 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
March 26, 2010
Votes: +1

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy