At the request of the governments of China, Pakistan and Russia, the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (UNHCR) will investigate allegations of civilian deaths resulting from U.S (as well as British and Israeli) drone strikes. Drawing on a sample of 25 drone strikes in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen and Palestine where reports of civilian deaths are considered credible, Ben Emmerson, the U.N’s special rapporteur for human rights and counterterrorism will lead the investigation.[1] The U.N announcement invited praise and optimism from numerous civil liberties and human rights organizations from across the world[2], and for good reason. The special rapporteur announced his intention to designate certain strikes as war crimes should they constitute as such according to international law.[3]
However, although there is willingness on the part of the United Nations to incorporate legal and humanitarian concerns in drone warfare, this aim does not include correcting the injustices committed against the victims of U.S drone strikes. For example, although the rapporteur is willing to identify war crimes, he has no intention to pursue action against the perpetrators.[4] In fact, a significant proportion of the rapporteur’s attention is directed at the reality of armed drones becoming common, i.e. in use with many of the 70 countries already deploying drones for surveillance and reconnaissance.[5] In other words, the U.N is using this investigation as a step towards creating a framework for drone warfare that would, in the words of the rapporteur, “regulate its use in a manner that complies with the requirements of international law.”[6] However, the extent to which future victims could be protected by such a framework by the U.N, an institution with little capacity to enforce its mandates upon states,[7] is questionable at best.
The reputation of U.S drone strikes (particularly those carried out by the Central Intelligence Agency or CIA) are widely recognized for their frequent attacks in countries with whom no war has been declared nor any sanction approved for foreign strikes.[8] To address the concern of violating another country’s sovereignty, the U.S. government asserts that it is granted permission by the recipient country’s government, such as in the case of Pakistan.[9] However, such governments are generally viewed by their populations as corrupt and submissive to foreign pressure and, thus, the strikes are seen as invasive.[10] Furthermore, drone strikes are often followed by allegations of civilian deaths, particularly of children[11] and even relief workers.[12]
[1] Ackerman, Spencer. “U.N. Drone Investigator: If Facts Lead to U.S. War Crimes, So Be It.” Wired. 29 January 2013. Available at: <http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/01/un-drone-inquiry/>
[2] Devereaux, Ryan. “UN inquiry into US drone strikes prompts cautious optimism.” The Guardian. 24 January 2013. Available at: <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/24/un-announces-drone-inquiry-human-rights>
[3] Ackerman, January 2013.
[4] Ackerman, Spencer. “Exclusive: U.N.’s Drone Investigator Backs Brennan for Top CIA Job.” Wired. 07 February 2013. Available at: <http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/02/un-drone-brennan/> and Ackerman, January 2013.
[5] “United Nations probe of drone strikes will help set rules for shadow warfare.” Toronto Star Editorial. 27 January 2013. Available at: <http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/2013/01/27/united_nations_probe_of_drone
_strikes_will_help_set_rules_for_shadow_warfare_editorial.html>
[6] “United Nations probe of drone strikes will help set rules for shadow warfare.” Toronto Star Editorial. 27 January 2013. Available at: <http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/2013/01/27/united_nations_probe_of_drone
_strikes_will_help_set_rules_for_shadow_warfare_editorial.html>
[7] Devereaux, January 2013.
[8] Orr. Andrew C. “Unmanned, Unprecedented, and Unresolved: The Status of American Drone Strikes in Pakistan Under International Law.” Cornell International Law Journal. 5 October 2012. Vol. 44. Available at: <http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/ILJ/upload/Orr-final.pdf>. Page 730-731
[9] Orr. Andrew C. “Unmanned, Unprecedented, and Unresolved: The Status of American Drone Strikes in Pakistan Under International Law.” Cornell International Law Journal. 5 October 2012. Vol. 44. Available at: <http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/ILJ/upload/Orr-final.pdf>. Page 732.
[10] Watson, Leon. “America’s deadly double tap drone attacks are ‘killing 49 people for every known terrorist in Pakistan’” The Daily Mail. 25 September 2012. Available at: <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2208307/Americas-deadly-double-tap-drone-attacks-killing-49-people-known-terrorist-Pakistan.html>
[11] Watson, Leon. “America’s deadly double tap drone attacks are ‘killing 49 people for every known terrorist in Pakistan’” The Daily Mail. 25 September 2012. Available at: <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2208307/Americas-deadly-double-tap-drone-attacks-killing-49-people-known-terrorist-Pakistan.html>
[12] Ackerman, January 2013.
[13] “US drone strikes: Memo reveals case for killing Americans.” BBC News. 5 February 2013 Available at: <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-21333570>
[14] Zenko, Micah. “Targeting Killings and Signature Strikes.” Council of Foreign Relations. 16 July 2012. Available at: <http://blogs.cfr.org/zenko/2012/07/16/targeted-killings-and-signature-strikes/>
[15] Ackerman, January 2013.
[16] Ackerman, February 2013
[17] Devereaux, January 2013
[18] Ackerman, February 2013
[19] Ackerman, February 2013
[20] Ackerman, February 2013
[21] Kilcullen, David and Andrew McDonald Exum. “Death From Above, Outrage Down Below.” The New York Times. 16 May 2009. Available at: < http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/opinion/17exum.html?_r=1>
[22] Watson, September 2012.
[23] “Drone strikes kill, maim and traumatize too many civilians, U.S. study says.” CNN. 25 September 2012. Available at: < http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/25/world/asia/pakistan-us-drone-strikes>
[24] “Drone strikes kill, maim and traumatize too many civilians, U.S. study says.” CNN. 25 September 2012. Available at: < http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/25/world/asia/pakistan-us-drone-strikes>