Khilafah.com

Tuesday
Nov 25th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

DHIMMI - Non-Muslims living in the Khilafah

E-mail Print PDF
The position of non-Muslims living under Islamic rule (dhimmi) is a widely misunderstood topic. Those wishing to attack Islam and its systems portray Islam’s treatment of the dhimmi as worse than its treatment of animals. Historical incidents where dhimmi suffered persecution at particular times are generalised and quoted out of context in order to back up their claims.

Joseph Farah, founder of the WorldNetDaily news site states:

Under Islamic Shari’ah law, non-believers – Christians and Jews anyway – are permitted to live as long as they support Islam through their Dhimmi taxes and are willing to accept what amounts to a third- or fourth-class servile existence, always subject to pogroms, false accusations and ill treatment. Dhimmis always live in fear.1


Melanie Philips, prominent UK based Zionist author and commentator states:

‘Dhimmi’ is the status of infidels under Islam who are permitted to live in Muslim jurisdictions but only with restrictions as second-class citizens.2

To answer this accusation that dhimmi are second-class citizens who will have a miserable existence living in a future Khilafah we need to look at Islam’s view on citizenship and how it applies to non-Muslims.

Citizenship in Islam


Citizenship in Islam is based on someone permanently living within the lands of the Khilafah regardless of their ethnicity or creed. It is not a requirement for someone to become Muslim and adopt the values of Islam in order to become a citizen of the state. Muslims living outside the Islamic State do not enjoy the rights of citizenship, whereas a non-Muslim living permanently within the Islamic State (dar ul-Islam) does. This is derived from the following hadith.

The Prophet (saw) said: ‘Call them to Islam, and if they agree accept from them and refrain from fighting against them, then call them to move from their land to the land of the Muhajireen (the emigrants), and tell them if they do so, then they will have the rights which the Muhajireen enjoy and they will have duties like the duties upon the Muhajireen.’3

This hadith means if they do not move to the land of the Muhajireen they would not enjoy what the Muhajireen enjoy, i.e. the rights of those who are living in the land of Islam. So this Hadith clearly shows the difference between those who move to the land of the Muhajireen and those who do not move to the land of the Muhajireen. Dar ul-Muhajireen was the land of Islam (Dar ul-Islam) at the time of the Prophet (saw), and all other lands were Dar ul-Kufr.4

The Islamic state is forbidden from discriminating between citizens on the basis of race, creed, colour or anything else. In origin all the rules of Islam apply equally to Muslims and non-Muslims. The Islamic scholars have agreed, especially the scholars of Usul (foundations), that the divine rules are addressed to every sane person able to understand the speech, whether he is Muslim or not, male or female.5

However, there are exceptions to this. If the Shari’ah rule is dependent on belief in Islam such as praying salah or giving the zakat tax then it applies only to Muslims. These exceptions are not discriminatory rules as some have claimed, but take in to account the beliefs and values of the citizen so as not to cause oppression to them. They in no way detract from being equal citizens.

Categories of non-Muslims in the Khilafah

There are four main categories of non-Muslims in the Khilafah. These are:

1. Mu’ahid
2. Must’amin
3. Ambassadors, diplomats, consuls and envoys
4. Dhimmi

The Mu’ahid is a citizen of a foreign state with which the Khilafah has a treaty. The citizens of this state (mu’ahideen) can enter the Khilafah without a passport or visa if this is reciprocated to the citizens of the Khilafah.6

The Must’amin is a citizen of a foreign state with which the Khilafah has no treaty. These states are the imperialistic states such as Britain, America, Russia and France. The citizens of these states can enter the Khilafah but only with a passport and valid visa. Once they have received a valid visa and enter the state they are termed Must’amin.7

If the Mu’ahid or Must’amin stays for more than one year within the Khilafah then their stay is considered permanent and they are required to pay the jizya (head tax) and will become dhimmi.8

When discussing the rights and responsibilities of the dhimmi in this article these for the most part apply equally to both the Mu’ahid and the Must’amin. The exceptions are in the specific terms of the treaties and visa applications adopted by the Khaleefah.

The Ambassadors, diplomats, consuls and envoys from the foreign states have diplomatic immunity and the rules of Islam do not apply on them.9

The Dhimmi


Dhimmi are those citizens of the Khilafah that hold different beliefs and values to the ideology of the state i.e. Islam. The word dhimmi is derived from the Arabic word dhimmah, which means pledge or covenant (‘ahd).10

The state makes a pledge to treat the dhimmi in accordance with the specific terms of the peace treaty made with them (if applicable) and not to interfere in their beliefs, worships and those actions that contradict Islam but were permitted to the dhimmi by the Messenger of Allah (saw) such as drinking alcohol. In all other areas they are viewed and treated in the same way as Muslims unless belief in Islam is a condition for the action.

There are many ahadith ordering good treatment of the dhimmi and not abusing them or treating them as second-class citizens.

The Messenger of Allah (saw) said: “He who harms a person under covenant, or charged him more than he can, I will argue against him on the Day of Judgement.”11

The Messenger of Allah (saw) said: “He who hurts a dhimmi hurts me, and he who hurts me annoys Allah.”12

The classical scholars of Islam also detailed the rights of the Muslims towards the dhimmi. The famous Maliki jurist, Shaha al-Deen al-Qarafi states:

The covenant of protection imposes upon us certain obligations toward the ahl al-dhimmah. They are our neighbours, under our shelter and protection upon the guarantee of Allah, His Messenger (saw), and the religion of Islam. Whoever violates these obligations against any one of them by so much as an abusive word, by slandering his reputation, or by doing him some injury or assisting in it, has breached the guarantee of Allah, His Messenger (saw), and the religion of Islam.13

Judiciary

One of the accusations against Islam’s treatment of dhimmi is that a dhimmi is not allowed to give evidence against a Muslim and his oath is not acceptable in an Islamic court.

Bat Ye’or states:

Every legal case involving a Muslim and a dhimmi was judged according to Koranic law. Although the very idea of justice implies equality between parties, a dhimmi was not allowed to give evidence against a Muslim. Since his oath was unacceptable in an Islamic court his Muslim opponent could not easily be condemned. In order to defend himself, the dhimmi was obliged to purchase Muslim witnesses at great expense.14

The rule of law applies to everyone within the Khilafah and there are no exceptions. It is obligatory for the Islamic State to judge in cases concerning the dhimmi with justice and no discrimination against them is allowed.

Allah (swt) says in the Holy Qur’an:

And if you judge, judge with justice between them.
Verily, Allah loves those who act justly.
15

The most famous example of this justice is in the legal trial of a Jew who stole the coat of armour of Imam Ali (ra) as he was travelling to a battle. The judge Shurayh made no exception for Ali (ra) even though he was the Khaleefah, a Muslim and also off to fight in a battle so was in desperate need of his armour. Shurayh ruled in favour of the Jew and accepted his testimony in court. Full details of the trial can be read here.

The dhimmi is allowed to be a witness in an Islamic court against a Muslim and their evidence is acceptable. The conditions of being a witness apply equally to Muslims and dhimmi. The conditions of a witness are: sane, mature and ‘adl (trustworthy).

It may be claimed that the condition of ‘Adl applies only to Muslims who refrain from committing the kabeera (major) sins. This is incorrect. ‘Adl in this context means someone who abstains from that which the people consider a violation of uprightness, whether he was a Muslim or non-Muslim. This is because ‘adaala (trustworthiness) was stipulated in the testimony of the Muslim as well as in the testimony of the non-Muslim, by using the same word without distinguishing one from the other.

Allah (swt) says in the Holy Qur’an:

O you who believe! Let there be witnesses between you when death draws to one of you, at the time of bequest, two witnesses, ‘adl (trustworthy) from among you, or two others from other than you.16

He (swt) meant non-Muslims by saying other than you. He said ‘two ‘adl witnesses from Muslims or two ‘adl from other than Muslims.’ So how can the ‘adaala be defined as not committing a kabeera (major) sin and insistence on committing a sagheera (small) sin regarding a non-Muslim? Also how can we reject as a witness the one who disobeyed his parents once, but accept as witness the spy, just because spying is not from kabeera sins? Therefore, the valid meaning of ‘adl is the one that abstained from that which the people consider violation to the uprightness.17

Criminal Punishments

Another accusation is that Muslims are given a lesser punishment for crimes against dhimmi. In the case of murder it is alleged that a Muslim is not killed for the murder of a dhimmi whereas a dhimmi is killed for the murder of a Muslim. Bat Ye’or states:

The punishment that a guilty Muslim received for a crime would be greatly reduced if the victim were a dhimmi.18

Again this is a false accusation. Punishments for crimes are applied equally to both Muslims and dhimmi with no distinction. The only distinction is that dhimmi will not be punished for those actions which are permitted for them such as drinking alcohol, whereas a Muslim would be.

The Prophet (saw) said, “The diyyah (blood money) of the Jews and Christians is like the Muslim’s diyyah.”19
It is narrated in a hadith “that the Messenger of Allah (saw) killed a Muslim for a mu’ahid and said, ‘I am the most noble of those who fulfil their dhimmah’.”20

This hadith clearly indicates that if a Muslim kills a mu’ahid he is punished with death.21 This equally applies to the killing of a dhimmi as discussed earlier.

Economy

The dhimmi enjoy the same economic benefits as Muslims. They can be employees, establish companies, be partners with Muslims and buy and sell goods. Their wealth is protected and if they are poor and unable to find work they are entitled to state benefits from the Khilafah’s Treasury (Bait ul-Mal).

Historically, many dhimmi prospered within the lands of the Khilafah.

Cecil Roth mentions that the treatment of the Jews at the hands of the Ottoman State attracted Jews from all over Western Europe. The land of Islam became the land of opportunity. Jewish physicians from the school of Salanca were employed in the service of the Sultan and the Viziers (ministers). In many places glass making and metalworking were Jewish monopolies, and with their knowledge of foreign languages, they were the greatest competitors of the Venetian traders.22

The poor dhimmi will receive state benefits if they are in need.

‘Umar ibn al-Khattab once passed by an old dhimmi begging at doors, and said: “We have not done justice to you if we have taken jizya from you in the prime of your youth and neglected you in your old age.” He then ordered from the treasury what was suitable for him.23

With regards taxation the shari’ah has put the condition of belief on some of the taxes, which means they are applied differently between the Muslims and dhimmi. Muslims for example are ordered to pay the Zakat but dhimmi are exempt, whereas dhimmi are ordered to pay the jizya (head tax) but Muslims are exempt.

Jizya

The most misunderstood Islamic taxation is the jizya. Some historians paint a picture that the jizya tax was so high that dhimmi were forced to convert to Islam to avoid it. Others bring out arbitrary jizya rates such as 50%.24

The obligation of the jizya is derived from the following verse of the Qur’an.

Allah (swt) says:

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold forbidden that which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued (saghiroon).25

The ‘subdued’ (sighar) mentioned in this verse means the dhimmi must submit to the rules of Islam. It does not mean physical humiliation.26

The jizya tax is applied to all mature, male dhimmi who have the means to pay it. Women and children are exempt as are the poor who have no livelihood.27

The jizya is applied according to the prosperity of the dhimmi. In the time of ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab (ra) he established three different bands of jizya depending on the prosperity of the person. The jizya rates for different provinces (wiliyat) of the Khilafah in the time of ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab (ra) are shown below.


dhimma1



In sahih Bukhari it has been narrated by Abu Najeeh who said, “I said to Mujahid: ‘What is the matter with the people of Ash-Sham who pay 4 Dinars and the people of Yemen pay 1 Dinar?’ He said, ‘This was decided based on prosperity.’”31

It is forbidden for the Khilafah to overburden the dhimmi with heavy taxation.

The Messenger of Allah (saw) said: “He who harms a person under covenant, or charged him more than he can, I will argue against him on the Day of Judgement.”32

‘Amr ibn Maymun said, “I saw ‘Umar four nights before he was assassinated sitting on top a camel, saying to Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman and ‘Uthman ibn al-Hunayf, ‘Review the affairs under your charge. Do you think that you have burdened the tenants with what they cannot bear?” ‘Uthman replied, ‘I have levied on them an amount that I could double and they would still have the ability to pay.’ Hudhayfa said: ‘I have imposed on them an amount that leaves a large surplus.’”

Abu Ubayd commenting on this said: this is the legal rule in our view for the imposition of jizya and kharaj; they are levied in accordance with the capacity of the dhimmis to pay, without burdening them and without adversely affecting the fay’ of the Muslims; however, no limit is imposed on it.33

When collecting the jizya this cannot be collected by abusing and torturing the dhimmi as some have claimed.

It is narrated from Hisham bin Hakeem, who said; “I bear witness that I heard the Messenger of Allah (saw) say; ‘Allah will punish those who punish the people in the Dunya.’”34

‘Umar ibn al-Khattab was brought a huge amount of wealth – Abu Ubayd: I believe, he said “Of jizya” – and he (‘Umar) said: “I think you must have placed the people in hardship (for such wealth).” They said: “No, by Allah, we did not collect anything that was not given voluntarily and of their own free will.” He said: “Without using the stick and without stringing (them up).” They said: “Yes.” He said: “Praise be to Allah, who has not caused this to happen at my hands or during my authority.” 35

With regards the Kharaj (agricultural land tax) this applies equally to Muslims and dhimmi with no distinction.

Community Relations

Muslim and dhimmi communities live together, side by side in the Khilafah. They are not persecuted, hated and forced to live in fear by the Muslims.

The dhimmi neighbours have the same rights as Muslim neighbours with no distinction.

The Prophet (saw) said: “Jibril (Angel Gabriel) kept recommending treating neighbours with kindness until I thought he would assign them a share of inheritance.”36

Muslims and dhimmi will visit each other, be courteous and socialise together. The Messenger of Allah (saw) used to visit the poorly from amongst the dhimmi.

It is narrated that a Jewish valet who used to serve the Messenger of Allah (saw) was once taken ill, so the Messenger of Allah (saw) visited him.37

Thomas Arnold describes the relations between dhimmi and Muslim communities in Spain under Islamic rule.

The toleration of the Muhammadan government towards its Christian subjects in Spain and the freedom of intercourse between the adherents of the two religions brought about a certain amount of assimilation in the two communities. Inter-marriages became frequent; Isidore of Beja, who fiercely inveighs against the Muslim conquerors, records the marriage of ‘Abd al-Aziz, the son of Musa, with the widow of King Roderic, without a word of blame. Many of the Christians adopted Arab names, and in outward observances imitated to some extent their Muhammadan neighbours, e.g. many were circumcised, and in matters of food and drink followed the practice of the “unbaptized pagans.38

The Christian Arabs of the present day, dwelling in the midst of a Muhammadan population, are a living testimony of this toleration; Layard speaks of having come across an encampment of Christian Arabs at al-Karak, to the east of the Dead Sea, who differed in no way either in dress or in manners, from the Muslim Arabs.39

Government

Another accusation is that dhimmi cannot be civil servants within the Khilafah or be members of the government.

It’s true that a dhimmi cannot hold any ruling position within the Khilafah. This is because the Shari’ah has restricted these positions to those who believe in the ideology of the state i.e. Islam. This is no different to any ideological state within the world today.

Muhammad Asad states:

One cannot escape the fact that no non-Muslim citizen – however great his personal integrity and his loyalty to the state – could, on psychological grounds, ever be supposed to work wholeheartedly for the ideological objectives of Islam; nor, in fairness, could such a demand be made of him. On the other hand, no ideological organization (whether based on religious or other doctrines) can afford to entrust the direction of its affairs to persons not professing its ideology. Is it, for instance, conceivable that a non-Communist could be given a political key position – not to speak of supreme leadership of the state – in Soviet Russia? Obviously not, and logically so: for as long as communism supplies the ideological basis of the state, only persons who identify themselves unreservedly with its aims can be relied upon to translate those aims into terms of administrative policy.40

Having said this dhimmi can be civil servants and directors of the administrative government departments. Discrimination against dhimmi for civil service posts is forbidden.

The evidence for this is from the Islamic rules on hiring (Ijara) where it is permitted to hire any person whether Muslim or non-Muslim. This is because the evidences for hiring came in a general form.

Allah (swt) says;

And if they suckled for you, do give them their wage.41

The Messenger of Allah (saw) said: “Allah (swt) said; I will challenge three people on the day of Judgement.…. and a man who employed a labourer, he received from him (the work) but did not give him his wage.”42

The Messenger of Allah (saw) himself once hired a man from the tribe Banu Ad-Deel who was a non-Muslim, which indicates that it is permitted to hire a non-Muslim just as it is to hire a Muslim.

All the above three evidences are general. Therefore, it is permitted for a non-Muslim to be a director of a government department or an employee in that department, for they are all hired staff, and the evidences about hiring are general.43

Although dhimmi cannot hold ruling positions within the government this does not mean they cannot politically participate within the Khilafah.

One of the pillars of the Islamic ruling system is consultation (shura). This function is institutionalised within an elected council called the Majlis al-Ummah (Council of the Ummah) that forms part of the Khilafah government.

The Majlis al-Ummah is an elected council whose members can be Muslim, non-Muslim, men or women. These members represent the interests of their constituencies within the state. The majlis has no powers of legislation like in a democratic parliament but it does have many powers that act as a counterbalance to the executive powers of the Khaleefah.

Members of the majlis can voice their political opinions freely without fear of imprisonment or rebuke. This makes the Majlis ul-Ummah a very powerful institution for accounting the Khaleefah and his government that the dhimmi can fully participate in.44

Religion

A widespread accusation against the Khilafah is that Islam was spread by the sword forcing non-Muslims to convert to Islam or die. This claim in particular is used to create fear and opposition within western countries to the re-emergence of a Khilafah in the Muslim world.

Islam categorically forbids forcing anyone to convert to Islam.

Allah (swt) says:

Let there be no compulsion in religion 45

Thomas Arnold states:

The toleration extended towards the Christian Arabs by the victorious Muslims of the first century of the Hijrah and continued by succeeding generations, we may surely infer that those Christian tribes that did embrace Islam, did so of their own choice and free will.46

Islam has also forbidden tempting non-Muslims away from their beliefs and worships.

The Messenger of Allah (saw) wrote to the people of Yemen: ‘Whoever is adamant upon Judaism or Christianity will not be tormented for it, and he is obliged to pay the jizya.’47

The meaning of ‘will not be tormented for it’ means the dhimmi are left to follow their beliefs and worships.48

Therefore dhimmi are allowed to follow their own beliefs, the rules of their religion and perform actions with although forbidden in Islam were permitted to them by the Messenger of Allah (saw) such as drinking alcohol, eating pork, marriage and divorce.49

The dhimmi places of worship are also protected by the Khilafah. The existence of centuries old Churches, Synagogues and Temples throughout the Muslim world is clear evidence to this fact.

Since these areas are the only areas a religion such as Christianity, Judaism or Hinduism has detailed rules for, the dhimmi will generally face no conflicts between their religions and living within the Khilafah.

Conclusion

The dhimmi are citizens of the Khilafah and enjoy all the rights of citizenship such as protection, guaranteed living and fair treatment. They also enjoy the right of being treated with kindness, leniency, justice and clemency. They can join the Islamic armed forces and fight alongside the Muslims if they choose to do so, but they are not obliged to fight as the Muslims are. They are viewed by the ruler and the judge in the same light as the Muslims are viewed without any discrimination in terms of managing their affairs and when implementing the rules of transactions (mu’amilat) and the penal code (hudud) upon them.

Therefore, the dhimmi enjoys all the rights, equally and exactly as those enjoyed by the Muslims except those rights which are specific to them because of their belief or specific to Muslims because of their belief. They are in no way classed as second class citizens.50


References

1 Joseph Farah, October 26, 2006, Between the Lines Commentary, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52609

2 Melanie Phillips, ‘Dhimmi Britain,’ January 14, 2004, http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/archives/000265.html

3 Narrated by Sulayman Bin Buraida, Sahih Muslim, Hadith no. 4294

4 Hizb ut-Tahrir, ‘The Methodology of Hizb ut-Tahrir for Change,’ Al-Khilafah Publications, p. 6

5 Taqiuddin an-Nabhani, ‘The Ruling System in Islam,’ translation of Nizam ul-Hukm fil Islam, Khilafah Publications, Fifth Edition, p. 247

6 Taqiuddin an-Nabhani, ‘The draft constitution of the Khilafah State. The Introduction and the incumbent reasons,’ translation of Muqadimatud-Dustur Aw al-Asbabul Mujibatulah, Article 184

7 Ibid

8 Taqiuddin an-Nabhani, ‘The Islamic Personality,’ Volume 2, translation of Shakhsiya Islamiyya, Dar ul-Ummah, Beirut, Fourth Edition, Chapter Al-Must’amin

9 Taqiuddin an-Nabhani, ‘The draft constitution of the Khilafah State,’ Op.cit., Article 7f

10 Taqiuddin an-Nabhani, ‘The Islamic Personality,’ Op.cit., Chapter Ahkam adh-dhimmi

11 Narrated by Yahya b. Adam in the book of Al-Kharaaj

12 Reported by al-Tabarani in Al-awsat on good authority

13 Shaha al-Deen al-Qarafi, Al-furuq

14 Bat Ye’or, ‘The Dhimmi, Jews and Christians under Islam,’ 1985 Associated University Presses, p. 56

15 Holy Qur’an, Chapter 5, Surah al-Ma’idah, Verse 42

16 Holy Qur’an, Chapter 5, Surah al-Ma’idah, Verse 106

17 Ahmad ad-Da’our, ‘The Rules of Testimonial Evidences,’ Translation of Ahkaam al-bayyinaat, Chapter: Conditions (shuroot) of the witness

18 Bat Ye’or, Op.cit., p. 57

19 Narrated from Amru bin Shuaib from his father from his grandfather

20 Al-Bayhaqi, extracted from the hadith of Abdurrahman Al-Bailimani

21 Abdurrahman Al-Maliki, ‘The Punishment System,’ translation of Nidham ul-uqubat, Dar Ul-Ummah, Beirut, Second Edition, Chapter: Al-Qawad

22 Cecil Roth, ‘The House of Nasi: Dona Gracia’

23 Abu ‘Ubayd al-Qasim ibn Sallam, ‘The Book of Revenue,’ Translation of Kitab al-Amwal, Garnet Publishing Ltd, p. 42

24 http://www.jews-for-allah.org/jewish-mythson-islam/dhimmi-tax-fiftypercent.htm

25 Holy Qur’an, Chapter 9, Surah at-Taubah, Verse 29

26 Taqiuddin an-Nabhani, ‘The draft constitution of the Khilafah State,’ Op.cit., Article 7a

27 Abdul-Qadeem Zalloom, ‘Funds in the Khilafah State,’ translation of Al-Amwal fi Dowlat Al-Khilafah, Al-Khilafah Publications, 1988, p. 58

28 Abu ‘Ubayd, Op.cit., p. 25

29 Ibid, p. 37

30 Abdul-Qadeem Zalloom, Op.cit., p. 61

31 Sahih Bukhari

32 Narrated by Yahya b. Adam in the book of Al-Kharaaj

33 Abu ‘Ubayd, Op.cit., p. 37

34 Taqiuddin an-Nabhani, ‘The Ruling System in Islam,’ Op.cit., 271

35 Abu ‘Ubayd, Op.cit., p. 40

36 Sahih Bukhari

37 Ibid, on the authority of Anas

38 Thomas W. Arnold, ‘The Preaching of Islam,’ Second Edition, Kitab Bhavan Publishers, New Delhi, p. 128

39 Ibid, p. 47

40 Muhammad Asad, ‘The Principles of State and Government in Islam,’ Dar al-Andalus Ltd, Gibraltar, 1985, p. 41

41 Holy Qur’an, Chapter 65, Surah at-Talaq, Verse 6

42 Sahih Bukhari, narrated from Abu Hurairah

43 Taqiuddin an-Nabhani, ‘The Ruling System in Islam,’ Op.cit., 235

44 Ibid, p. 247

45 Holy Qur’an, Chapter 2, Surah al-Baqarah, Verse 256

46 Thomas W. Arnold, Op.cit., p. 47

47 Abu ‘Ubayd, Op.cit., p. 25

48 Taqiuddin an-Nabhani, ‘The Islamic Personality,’ Op.cit., Chapter Ahkam adh-dhimmi

49 Taqiuddin an-Nabhani, ‘The draft constitution of the Khilafah State,’ Op.cit., Articles 5&6

50 Ibid
Trackback(0)
Comments (9)add comment

oceanic said:

" However, there is still the issue of voting rights, which I have yet to see you address. There does not seem to be a similar parallel to being a citizen of your country, but being excluded from voting for the leader of said country. This would seem to be the very definition of being disenfranchised, to have a government that rules over you but to which you have no say at all in its character. To say, on the one hand, that non-Muslims cannot rule over Muslims or have any power over them would seem to be the very essence of a tiered citizenship, to have one group is inherently priviledged over the other group. "

Well technically even Muslims do not have voting rights in a muslim country, so i don't see how it makes non-Muslims tiered citizens, as they both have less rights than the caliph.

Secondly non-Muslims have no right to political power over Muslims in a Muslim country you say, that is only the case in a Muslim majority country, which is also the case vice-versa in non-muslim countries.

Just as in a non-Muslim countries where Muslims are minorities and will never be voted into power or allowed in power. Similarly in a Muslim country even if you allowed non-Muslims to stand for election, Islamic belief would never allow Muslims to vote for non-Muslims into power over them.

So it is a redundant point you have made. As democracy itself means it has same effect.

“If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal.”

Emma Goldman

Islamic law though does allow and encourage non-Muslims to send representatives to talk to the government.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 06, 2012
Votes: +1

the sad clown said:

You are correct in that there are limitations to being President. I might even add that in a certain sense, the Caliphate might be superior, in that there is not the same limitation for a person not born into a Muslim family as there is for someone not born in the territories of the United States.

However, there is still the issue of voting rights, which I have yet to see you address. There does not seem to be a similar parallel to being a citizen of your country, but being excluded from voting for the leader of said country. This would seem to be the very definition of being disenfranchised, to have a government that rules over you but to which you have no say at all in its character. To say, on the one hand, that non-Muslims cannot rule over Muslims or have any power over them would seem to be the very essence of a tiered citizenship, to have one group is inherently priviledged over the other group.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
August 30, 2010
Votes: +2

Abdul-Kareem said:

A Muslim is someone who submits themselves to the Creator - Allah in all their actions including ruling. A Muslim who is not secular and does not believe in the secular man-made constitution of the United States has no right to become the US President by American law because they will not abide by the oath of office which states:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States

Also to become the US President you must fulfil certain criteria:

be a natural born citizen of the United States
be at least thirty-five years old
have been a permanent resident in the United States for at least fourteen years

For all those who do not meet this criteria they have no right to become the President. Again not having this right does not mean they are second class citizens. So a 30 year old US citizen is not a second class citizen simply because he cant become President.

The Khilafah is not a secular state and Islam does not seperate religion and politics. Religion is therefore a central tenet of the state which is why religious faith plays a major part in the government as opposed to the west.

The Creator of man, life and the universe knows the best ruling system that people should live under and so we may deem some aspects to be bad and some good from our own opinions but ultimately it is the Creator Allah who defines what is good and bad.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
August 30, 2010
Votes: -1

the sad clown said:

Muslims have no right to be the ruler in America, western Europe or the UK, although on paper it may say differently. Does this mean Muslims are second class citizens in the west? No it doesn't.

But doesn't that mean that they do have the right, if it says so in the countries governing document? Isn't that what rights are about, that there is no legal basis for stopping you from being the President of the United States? I mean, you may not get enough votes to win, but nothing stops you from entering the election and trying. And there certain is nothing preventing a Muslim from voting for the leader of their nation. These seem like pretty fundamental differences. One of the most common characteristics of a second class citizenship is disenfranchisement.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
August 27, 2010
Votes: +2

Abdul-Kareem said:

Dhimmi have all the rights, equally and exactly as those enjoyed by the Muslims except those rights which are specific to them because of their belief or specific to Muslims because of their belief.

So dhimmi have no right to be a ruler in the Khilafah.

Muslims have no right to be the ruler in America, western Europe or the UK, although on paper it may say differently. Does this mean Muslims are second class citizens in the west? No it doesn't.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
August 27, 2010
Votes: +0

the sad clown said:

You mentioned multiple times that non-Muslims will not be second class citizens, and will have "all the rights, equally and exactly as those enjoyed by the Muslims".

And yet, in the article titled, "The Method to Appoint a Khaleefah", you mention, as justification for non-Muslims not being allowed to vote for the leader of their own state, "The non-Muslims cannot be in ruling positions nor can they elect the ruler, because there is no way (power) for them over the Muslims, and they have no say in the Bay'ah."

These two do not seem to go together well.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
August 26, 2010
Votes: +4

Irfan Amin said:

Jazakallah u khira... And thanks for sharing the information...

"Wa kul jaa al haqu wa zahakal baatil, inal baatila kaana zahooka" Quraan
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 09, 2009
Votes: -2

AbdulBasit Khan said:

Awesome - this really clarified a loot. The sad thing is, that many people are out there, and they don't know this stuff, and they are continuing talking nonsense (in their ignorance and folly).

* Instead of praying against the non-muslims, we should pray for them that Allah opens their eyes, and guides them to the Right Way, and helps the Muslim Ummah to wake up and start practicing Islaam & showing the non-Muslims how true Muslims behave; our ethics, our akhlaaq, our behavior, our character, our standards, our principles and how we treat people kindly -- as Rasoolullah did.

As for the oppressors and tyrants, we pray that God rid us of them and end their cruelty and evil. Ameen.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
February 04, 2009
Votes: -2

munir ali salga said:

may Allah helpHIS religion throughout the world aand may kufur be defeated,ameen
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
January 18, 2009
Votes: -4

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

busy