Khilafah.com

A debate between Bassam Ishak, member of Syrian National Coalition for Opposition and Revolutionary Forces and Ahmad Al-Qasas Media Office Head of Hizb ut-Tahrir Lebanon, on the subject of "Religious state or civil state?"

Adobe Flash Player not installed or older than 9.0.115!

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (2)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Abdullah said:

It would be interesting to see a debate about why the Khilafah must be considered as the only suitable alternative to Assad, and for the doubters, in the light of the 'failed' Arab spring, which has thus far not managed to remove any of the regimes, only their figure heads. Therefore a completely radical change is required, one which has a comprehensive alternative rather than a limited vision of removing just one man or one family. The call for the Khilafah state actually satisfies this criteria of replacing the current regime with a completely new system, one which would be held up by its nation, whether the minority groups within it believed in it's creed or not, as the history of Islam proved their fair and just treatment under the Khilafah system. This as well as the other questions around what this state would need to constitute and practically implement needs also to be addressed. Jzk

report abuse vote down vote up

December 02, 2012
Votes: +1

Dr Q A said:

	AoA... This is only one side of the debate and did not show the opponents views on the issue.
	report abuse vote down vote up

November 28, 2012
Votes: +4

Name

Email

Title

Comment

smaller | bigger

I have read and agree to the Terms of Usage.

Write the displayed characters

Add Comment