Khilafah.com

Friday
Mar 12th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Q&A: The Nature of Bid'ah

E-mail Print PDF

بِسْمِ اللّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ

Question: During one of our meetings, we discussed the word "Bid'ah." Some of us said that it refers to everything that contravenes the command of The Legislator (Al-Shaari'), and others said that it refers only to contravening the command of The Legislator in matters of ‘Ibadaat (acts of worship). Could you please clarify this issue? Jazakum Allahu Khairan.

Answer:

1- The commands of The Legislator are two types: The first type is in Seeghat Al-Amr (the form of a command) and accompanied with the explanation of the method to complete this command (i.e. the practical steps to implement it from start to finish). For example, Allah سبحانه وتعالى says:

وَأَقِيمُواْ الصَّلاَةَ

"And perform Salat" [Al-Baqara, 2:43]

this is in Seeghat Al-Amr, but it was not left to man to pray however he pleases, but rather other texts were revealed that explain exactly how prayer is performed, including the intention, standing, recitation, Rukoo', Sujood, etc. Equally, Allah سبحانه وتعالى revealed:

وَلِلّهِ عَلَى النَّاسِ حِجُّ الْبَيْتِ

"And Hajj to the House (Ka'ba) is a duty that mankind owes to Allah" [Al-Imran, 3:97],

and this is also in Seeghat Al-Amr, but in the form of "news in the context of a command," and this is also accompanied by texts explaining how this command to perform Hajj is to be completed from start to finish.

The second type is also in Seeghat Al-Amr, but is general (‘Aam) or unrestricted (Mutlaq), and is not accompanied by the method to complete the command (the practical steps to implement it). For example, the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم said:

"Whoever (loaned something or sold something on credit), then the measure must be known, the weight must be known, and the period (until payment is made) must be known" [Bukhari];

here, the command with relation to selling something on credit is in Seeghat Al-Jumla Al-Shartiyyah (the form of a conditional sentence), ordering us to know the measure, weight and payment period, but The Legislator did not explain the specific steps to complete the contract, such as, for example, having the two contractors stand before each other, one of them recite something from the Qur'an, then each of them take a step forward, then they hug each other, then they discuss the credit contract, followed by an offer and an acceptance, etc.

Another example is the Ahadith of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم:

"Gold (traded for) gold is Riba, except when (it is exchanged immediately in the same meeting)" [Bukhari] and

"Gold (traded) for gold, likeness to likeness, and paper (traded) for paper, likeness to likeness" [Bukhari and Muslim].

These Ahadith are "a command in the form of news," but the specific steps to complete the trading were not given, as explained in the previous examples.

In another example, it was narrated to us through authentic Ahadith that the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم would stand up when a funeral procession would pass him. It was narrated in Sahih Muslim:

"If you see a funeral procession, then stand up for it..."

and the actions of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم are a form of a Talab (request or command), but he صلى الله عليه وسلم did not show us exactly how to perform the exact steps related to this command, as demonstrated in the first example.

Hence, there are commands from The Legislator that were accompanied by texts detailing the practical steps for implementation, and there are commands from The Legislator that are general (‘Aam) or unrestricted (Mutlaq) that were not accompanied by detailed practical steps for implementation.

2- The expression (Istilaah) "Bid'ah" applies when a command of The Legislator, with which texts detailing the practical steps for implementation were also revealed, are contravened. This is because the command was not implemented exactly as instructed by The Legislator.

The linguistic (Lughawi) meaning of the word "Bid'ah," as explained in Lisaan Al-Arab: "The Mubtadi' (person who carries out a Bid'ah) is the person who brings forth something in a manner that is different than was known previously [...] and if you (Abda't) something, it means that you invented it and it is unique."

The above definition also applies to the Istilaahi meaning of the word "Bid'ah," i.e. contravening the Shar'iee method, as detailed by Islamic legislation, to complete a Shar'iee matter. This is what the Hadith,

"Whoever performs an act that is not upon our command, it is rejected" [Bukhari and Muslim]

is referring to. Thus, whoever performs three Sujood (prostrations) instead of two during his Salat has committed a Bid'ah, and whoever throws eight stones at the Jamrat of Mina instead of seven has committed a Bid'ah. Every Bid'ah is a misguidance, and every misguidance is in the Hellfire (i.e. he is sinful for the action).

3- Contravening a command of The Legislator that was not accompanied by the practical steps for implementation falls under the classification of Hukum Shari'ee, and is defined as Haram, Makruh or Mubah if the address was Khitaab Takleef (prescriptive address), and Baatil (invalid) or Faasid (corrupt) if the address was Khitaab Wadh' (descriptive address). This, in turn, is dependent on the form of the Qareena (conjunctive evidence) that accompanies the command, whether in the form of Jazm (decisive), Tarjeeh (outweighing), or Takhyeer (choice).

So, going back to our first example, if someone sells something on credit (i.e. completed the contract of sale) in contravention to the command of The Legislator (i.e. without knowing the measure, or the weight, or the deadline when payment will be made), it cannot be said that he has committed a Bid'ah, but rather it is said that this contract contravenes the command of The Legislator and is Baatil or Faasid depending on the type of contravention.

And in the second example, if a person traded gold for gold in contravention to the command:

"Gold (traded for) gold is Riba, except when (it is exchanged immediately in the same meeting)" and "...likeness to likeness," (i.e. not exchanged immediately and not likeness to likeness),

it cannot be said that he has committed a Bid'ah by contravening the command, but rather it is said that he committed Haram by being involved in a Riba contract.

And failure to stand up when a funeral procession passes, choosing to remain seated, cannot be called a Bid'ah, but rather is called Mubah (permissible) because Islamic texts have been narrated for both cases. It was reported by Muslim of Ali Bin Abi Taalib (ra) who said:

"The Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم stood up then sat down" [Muslim].

This also applies to the command of The Legislator,

"...seek (the wife) with (strong) Deen, otherwise you will (lose)" [Bukhari],

where contravening this command cannot be called a Bid'ah, but rather the Islamic ruling regarding marrying a woman who does not have a strong Deen should be researched. This is because the practical steps for choosing a wife have not been given, where, for example, the man might stand before the woman and recites Ayat ul-Kursi, then he takes one step forward and recites the two Mu'awithaat, then he takes one step forward and says Bismillah, then he extends his right arm forward and proposes marriage, and so on.

This also applies to the Hadith of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم to the tradesmen,

"O tradesmen, this buying and selling (or market) is attended by Laghw (false speech) and swearing oaths, so fill it with charity" [Abu Dawood and Ahmed],

due to their excessive swearing of oaths during trade. But The Legislator did not clarify specific steps to implement the command "...so fill it" and therefore it cannot be said that if someone sold something and swore an oath, but then did not give charity, that he come with a Bid'ah; rather, the Islamic ruling regarding a tradesman not giving charity after swearing oaths should be researched on its own.

This applies to all contraventions of the commands of The Legislator that were not accompanied with specific steps for implementation.

4- By looking more deeply (Istiqraa') into the Islamic legal texts, we find that only the majority of the ‘Ibadaat (acts of worship) are accompanied by exact, practical steps for implementing the commands of The Legislator, and therefore Bid'ah does not occur outside of the ‘Ibadaat.

We say "the majority of the ‘Ibadaat" here because some of them were not accompanied by practical steps for implementation. One example of this is Jihad. Even though it is an act of ‘Ibaada, but the commands related to it came unrestricted (Mutlaq) or general (‘Aam), such as the verse:

قَاتِلُواْ الَّذِينَ يَلُونَكُم مِّنَ الْكُفَّارِ

"Fight those of the disbelievers that are close to you" [At-Tawba, 9:123]

and the verse:

جَاهِدِ الْكُفَّارَ وَالْمُنَافِقِينَ وَاغْلُظْ عَلَيْهِمْ

"Fight (Jaahiduu) against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be harsh against them" [At-Tawba, 9:73]

These commands are not accompanied with Islamic texts to detail the exact steps to implement them, such as how to fight: if you would recite an Ayah, then shoot a bullet, then take a step forward, then shoot another bullet, then take a step to the right, and so on.

Hence, a person that does not perform Jihad when it is prescribed upon him is not said to have come forth with a Bid'ah, but rather he has committed a Haram for his neglecting Jihad.

5- In conclusion, contravening a command of The Legislator that was accompanied by an exact explanation of the steps required to complete the command is a Bid'ah. And contravening an unrestricted (Mutlaq) or general (‘Aam) command of The Legislator that is not accompanied by an exact explanation of the steps required to complete the command is a contravention of the Ahkam Shar'iee: Haram, Makruh, or Mubah if it is in a Khitaab Takleef (prescriptive address), and Baatil or Faasid if in a Khitaab Wadh' (descriptive address).

And by looking more deeply (Istiqraa'), we find that the majority of ‘Ibadaat were accompanied by the exact steps for implementation, and therefore contravening these laws falls under the classification of Bid'ah.

6- As for the evidences regarding Mu'amalaat (transactions) and Jihad, these were revealed in an unrestricted (Mutlaq) and general (‘Aam) fashion, and therefore contravening these commands falls under the classification of Ahkam Shar'iee: Haram, Makruh, or Mubah if it is in a Khitaab Takleef (prescriptive address), and Baatil or Faasid if in a Khitaab Wadh' (descriptive address).

 

29th of Ramadhan, 1430 Hijri
18/9/2009

Trackback(0)
Comments (17)add comment

thinking brain said:

i ahve never seen such a an indepth understanding about the topic of bidah. As for those brothers who are still confused my advice to them is that if we just read is crefully and also increase our general understanding of fiqh and usool, their conffusion will be cleared up. And they could easily see that what is bidah and what is not.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 21, 2009
Votes: +0

Mazin said:

assalamu alaykum,

Abu Laith and others, the article is very clear in stating that the legal (Shar'iee) definition of Bid'ah, according to Shaykh 'Ata, is any act that contravenes (whether contradicting, adding to or subtracting from) a set "from-start-to-finish" method of implementing a Hukum that falls within 'Ibadaat. It does not apply to any Mu'amalat.

So, if there is a Hukum within Ibadaat that has a method that includes: "You must start with X, continue to Y, and finish with Z," then changing/omitting any "pillar" of completing the Hukum, or adding to the method where the method does not allow any additions, this falls under Bid'ah.

If none of the above applies, then it falls under Haram/Makruh/Mubah, or Baatil/Faasid.

As brother Abu Umar mentioned, the majority of the confusion here is when people mix the legal (Shari'ee) meaning of Bid'ah with the linguistic or Istilaahi meaning of Bid'ah. We are only discussing the Islamic Shari'ee meaning here.

assalamu alaykum.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 21, 2009
Votes: +0

Abu Umar said:

Salam, clearly understanding the differences between usooly meaning of word 'bid'ah' and the linguistic and general meaning of the word 'Bid'ah' is very important in this topic. As sheikh Ata mentioned in his article, usooly meaning of the Bid'ah will applied only (mostly) related the ‘Ibadaat (acts of worship) accept few 'Ibadaat such as Jihad. Therefore Bid'ah does not occur outside of the ‘Ibadaat.

But if anyone trying to use the word Bid'ah in very general way or linguistically for every new action (innovations) in Islam without differentiating from Usooly understanding, it can cause problem and misunderstanding amongst the Ummah.

So If anything innovated in the acts of Obadiah (act of worship), it is called as Bid’ah. If anything innovated in the acts apart from the Ibadaath that falls under the classification of Ahkam Shar'iee(eg: miladun Nabi, dua after salah, contacting Taraweeh in Jamath, etc.)It’s much more relevant to call that acts by using Haram, Mubah, baatil, etc. Allah(SWT) knows best.

 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 19, 2009
Votes: +0

Dr Q A said:

Aa... :)

In short I think we need to have more material on this issue inshAllah... Members of Hizb please take note...

JzkAllah Abu Laith and bro Paki... that was helpful too...

Masalama
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 18, 2009
Votes: +0

Abu laith said:

This however doesn't answer my query which is specifcally whether it would be better to define bi'dah as ascribing a value which the shara has not given. Eg if you don't fulfill the conditions of a contract you may have committed haram but if you introduce new elements into a contract and believe that this is mandoub or obligatory when the shara doesn't stipulate such a condition then this would be bida?  
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 18, 2009
Votes: +0

Abu laith said:

Salaams

I think my points are slightly different to some of the points raised. As the shaykh has said certain ibadat have been left general in the manner by which you can fulfill them. For example I can make dua before I post a comment on khilafah.com. That's because dua has not be specified as to when it can be performed or under what circumstances. So if I make it a specific habit to make dua before posting here then this is perfectly halal and in fact recommended as I get the reward that is attached to making dua. However if I specify that the prophet (saw) made dua before he posted a comment on k.com then I have invented a thing and thus made a bida. This is similar to making dua after salah if a person specifies it as being what the prophet (saw) did then this is a bida if no evidence exist that the prophet specified this act. However if I perform the act as a habit knowing that it hasn't been specifically specified by the prophet (saw) then it is not bida. This also helps to explain umar (ra) actions as the taraweeh were left unspecified on whether t could be performed alone or in jammah (infact evidence exist that both acts were done by the prophet). However we also have other evidence that performig salah in jammah even the recommended salah carries greater reward than praying individually thus to organise the taraweeh salah in jammah is acting upon the general evidence not technically inventing something completely new. Other examples that potentially fall into this is eid miladun nabi, it has not been specifically mentioned in the sunnah at best indicated indirectly. However to mark out this day through extra ibadah because it reminds us of the favour and great blessing of the birth of the prophet (saw) hence this encourages us to gather in the mosque making extra dhikr and ibadah then this isn't bi'dah (according to a number of ulema) it can become bi'dah if a person uses the celebration of eid miladun nabi as a mark of separation between Muslims believing that those who don't are outside ahlel sunnah wal jammah. Similar example is holding conferences and demonstrations to mark the fall of the khilafah in the month of rajab, the act of commemoration does not fall into bi'dah unless you give it a value which the shara hasn't.    

As for bi'dah in belief it refers to those who adopt an incorrect belief or reject a correct belief. However this is complex, according to usooli scholars there exists two types of definite knowledge one is ilm dharoori others are ilm nadhari. Ilm dharoori or necessary knowledge is definite in an objective sense that comes to the person without investigation because of the overwhelming evidence. For example a type of ilm dharoori is belief in angels or obligation of zakat. Ilm nadhari is definite knowledge that comes to the one who has investigated the matter. Thus it is definite for the one who has investigated the matter and obviously kufr to reject it. However the one who has not investigated may differ with him or he maybe led to another conclusion or he follows and makes tasdeeq in the matter as he may not have the knowledge or the capability to investigate it. An example of this is the principle of ijma which imam ghazzali discusses in his al mustasfa which he says is established via ahad narrations that collated reach mutawattir and indicate the principle of ijma as a definite principle. And he believed the principle was not just restricted to the sahaba or the salaf but for all of the ummah in whatever generation. Other scholars like Ibn hazm disagreed with him through his own investigation which led him to confirm ijma but restrict it to the sahaba time only. So it is definite for one scholar but not for another ie ijma after sahaba was definite for imam ghazzali but not for ibn hazm. Therefore ilm nadhari is definite relative to the scholar. It is on these matters that if a Muslim rejects a qati matter without reason they would be termed deviant but not disbeliever as the matter wasn't ilm dharoori but ilm nadhari. But the scholar would believe that the rejection of the ilm nadhari matter which rejects the definite aspects of the deen but it just happens the hujjah (proof) would need to be established against them before making takfeer. Or they may say the ulema of ahlel bi'dah are kuffar but the awwam are mubtadi because the ulema have through virtue of their knowledge the hujjah established against them but the awwam do not due to their ignorance but there can be no excuse of ignorance on ilm dharoori matters. This is how I understand it although much more could be said on this particular topic.   
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 18, 2009
Votes: +0

Paki said:

Salams,

There are two different things in Islam. One is aqeeda and the other is Ahkaam-e-Sharia (i.e orders of legislators pertaining our actions).

AQEEDA:
Addition in aqeeda can be of two types:
a) Addition which is contradictory to the aqeeda or any subtraction of concept from aqeeda is termed as 'Kufr'. Means a person may fall out of the fold of islam. Like someone said Muhammad (saw) was not the last Nabi but Imam Mehdi or Ghulam ahmed qadiani is the last messenger etc...
b) Addition made which is not contradictory to aqeeda or some concept added to aqeeda which should not have been part of the aqeeda is not kufr it is rather 'Haram'. Like some one taking ahad hadiths as part of aqeeda etc...
The example of believing in 12 Imams may also fall under this category.

Ahkaam-e-Sharia:
Bidah comes under the category of ahkaam-e-sharia. And as explained above the Bidah is concerned with the actions pertaining Ibadah. As the closest word to explain the meaning of Bidah is Innovation but this innovation is restricted to Ibadah.
However this doesnot mean doing any new actions in mumlaat is not haram but it cannot be termed as Bidah.

The above is my understanding from different articles and books. However Allah knows better.

I also feel the above article is a bit complicated and confusing. One can read the old khilafah magazines for detail understanding of Bidah in one of the articles.

Wasalamz,
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 18, 2009
Votes: +0

Dr Q A said:

AA... I had a feeling this topic has the potential to explode... :)

I ll just ask a question in case the party kindly decides to answer some of the questions people are posting here...

Is it permissible to build Turba? In Turkey I went for dua for a lot of Khulafah who have Turba in many places... If the party considers it appropriate would like some clarification on this... I know that the party is against demolishing any of these Turbas or Mazaars as they are called in the subcontinent...

Waqas: (Moderators please correct me if I say something wrong)... It is permissible to celebrate the Prophet saw birthday as there is a hadith the translation/meaning of which is that even Abu Jahl gets some relief on this day in hell fire when he gets a few drops of water from the fingers that he motioned towards the slave who brought him the news of the birth of the Prophet saw... If I remember correctly he did that to free the slave in the happiness of the birth of his nephew i.e our master Muhammad saw... So if a Jahil Kafir like Abu Jahl gets some relief due to the happiness he showed at birth of the prophet then there is no harm in being happy about the day that our master was born...

The real problem is nt the celebration of the birth of the prophet... I remember in school we used to have interesting debates on this day where a lot of seerah was discussed and qirat competitions were held... The real problem is that although some people combine the heavens and earths when it comes down to celebrating the birth of the Prophet but in their real lives they dont even bother working for Khilafah or struggling to make the deen strong... whats the point in all the waste of electricity that some people engage in when they decorate buildings with all sorts of lights on this day thinking that they are earning great reward but after that they go back to doing nothing of real value to the cause of Islam...

 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 18, 2009
Votes: +0

waqas said:

I'm still not clear. As abu Laith mentioned are those actions also bid'ah. And is celebrating the prophets birthday or reading durood before every azan a bid'ah? And is marking 10th muharramas a special black day due to karbala also bid'ah?
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 17, 2009
Votes: +0

Dr Q A said:

AA... Bro Abul Karim... There is no such thing as 12 infallible Imaams... My question is fairly straight forward... If someone holds something as integral to Aqeedah then it implies that if someone who does nt hold the same belief as Aqeedah is removing something from the basic tenets of Islam according to the first person and that is kufr... So its a serious matter...

I m giving an example of 12 imaams but it can also be applied to those who believe that Ahd Ahadith should be taken in matters of Aqeedah... is nt that a bidah also?
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 17, 2009
Votes: +0

Abu Yusuf al-Hanbali said:

Assalaamu alaikum wa rahmatullah

This subject of bid’a is a very common debate amongst the ‘La madhabi’ and ‘Sufi Tariqas’

In my understand both agree bid’a only happens in Ibadah. While ‘La madhabi’ say all new acts in ibadah is bid’a and the ‘Sufi Tariqas’ say there are generally two types: Good Bid’a and Bad Bid’a (eg well known opinion from Imam Nawawi (ra) in his Tahzib asma’ as sifa)

Sheikh Ata’ did not give an example of bid’a happening in non-ibadah actions.

From the above I understand the bid’a can only happen in I’badah, but not all ibadah eg Jihad.

I also understand those ibadah that did not in origin come with particle steps and someone invents a practical step would not be bid’a simply because there was no practical actions in the first place.

From Sheikh Ata’s example of funeral procession would tell me he does not believe there to be good bid’a.

For example, doing du’ah in Jamaah’ after the Fard Salah would not be bid’a as there was no practical steps given by shari’ee that one must do but rather a choice was given. And due to the generality of du'ah that one can do it wherever and whenever (unless restricted by nass) then it can be done in jamaah’ with Imaam after fard salah. Like the way Umar al Khattab (ra) added bismillah and other additions at the end of Darud (although the Sufi Tariqas will call these Bid’a Hasanah! (Good Bid’a), a semantic difference...but ‘La Madhabi’ will call it bid’a).

Ma as salama
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 17, 2009
Votes: +0

Abu laith said:

"Scholars have differed as to what is Mubah and what is Mandoub based on differences in Usool etc..., so we have to be careful because maybe what one thinks is Mubah or Mandoub may not be the same for another and therefore it can not called a Bida'a rather an opinion based on daleel. "

jzk. I was specifically referring to matters which have no khilaaf and established as definite ahkam. I have always had the understanding that the classical ulema defined specific to matters of ibadah and aqeeda, however wouldn't it
be better to define bi'dah as giving a value to something which the shara (ie qati aspects of the shara) has not stipulated?
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 17, 2009
Votes: +0

abul karim said:

Just some points to consider:

1) Providing classical sources:
This in origin is fine, however today we have moved away from looking at the evidence and what has been presented and more concerned about who presented it and it should not be like this. Every Muslim is obliged to know the basic elements of his Deen, therefore when someone presents a ridiculous assertion that Khilfah has nothing to do with Islam we know he is lacking any serious knowledge assuming that he is not an 'actor' on behalf of the enemies of Islam and referencing classical sources gives strength to the argument after the evidences from the Kitab and Sunnah are presented.

2) An example of the Mubah made into a Mandoub:
Scholars have differed as to what is Mubah and what is Mandoub based on differences in Usool etc..., so we have to be careful because maybe what one thinks is Mubah or Mandoub may not be the same for another and therefore it can not called a Bida'a rather an opinion based on daleel.

3) There can be Bida'a in belief if you understand that aqeedah is that which one is ordered to believe in from the Quran and Sunnah. Unfortunately due to some confusions the branches of the Aqeedah have been understood as its core and this has led many to accuse one another of bida'a in belief, Allal wa 'laam
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 17, 2009
Votes: +0

Alma said:

Mohammed the article is supported with the Quran and ahadith...Ahmed, Abu Dawood, Muslim, Bukhari...are not classical or enough for you???. You can bring a different perspective...
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 17, 2009
Votes: +0

Mohammed said:

Assalamu Alaikum,

Jzk for the article.

I would appreciate if you would be able to provide classical scholars view on Bidah to support your article.


 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 16, 2009
Votes: -1

Abu laith said:

Salaams

What about ascribing a value which the shara hasn't given. For example stating that a mubah act is a mandoub even if in origin thr mubah act involves something in the muamilat. Or undertaking a mandoub act whose method has not been specified in the shara but then specifying a method for eg specifying that dua in congregation after salah is part of the sunnah. So ordinarily it would be permissible to make the dua after salah as dua's timing has not been specified thus to perform it after salah would be acceptable and the reward is in the dua but to specify that this is what the prophet did thus it is rcommended then without evidence for this it would become bi'dah?
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 16, 2009
Votes: +0

Dr Q A said:

AA... This was a bit too complicated for a lay person like myself...

Can I just ask a question... I am under the impression that if someone adds something new into the core concepts or Aqeedah of Islam... that is also considered a bid ah... for example the idea that one should hold a belief in 12 infallible Imams... Is it a correct understanding?

Masalam
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 16, 2009
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

busy