On November 23rd 2013, President Obama termed the nuclear deal with Iran as historic, and it was the first time since negotiations commenced in 2003 that brakes were put on Iran’s so called nuclear weapons programme. He said, “Simply put, they cut off Iran’s most likely paths to a bomb.” The Jewish state does not share the same view and is opposed to the deal. The Jewish Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, called the agreement a “historic mistake”.
Other states most notably the Gulf countries are disappointed with the agreement. Sami al-Faraj, a security adviser to the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), told Reuters that Gulf Arab governments felt slighted by the deal. “Iran is sitting at the high table,” he said. “We are left with the leftovers.” He added, “We will acquire more weapons. We are going to check if our shopping list is adequate to respond to this. We are going to rally other nations that are hurt by this action into a unified diplomatic campaign.”
Meanwhile, Iran struck a celebratory tone. Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said, “God’s grace and the support of the Iranian nation were the reasons behind this success,” while Hassan Rouhani, the Iranian president, summed it up as an overwhelmingly positive deal. “This agreement benefits all regional countries and global peace,” he said. So who are the real winners and losers here?
The answer lies in what has been agreed. The deal reached between Iran and the P5+1 (America, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany) is an interim deal and is the first step in a comprehensive agreement to be conclude in the future. The interim accord signed in Geneva sets out the following conditions:
• Iran will stop installing new centrifuges, and also refrain from using the thousands of centrifuges that have been installed but are not yet enriching uranium.
• Iran’s nuclear fuel stockpile in six months would not be allowed to grow beyond current levels. In practice, Iran would face a choice of either halting enrichment or converting its uranium into metal fuel plates.
• Iran agreed to halt all production of so-called 20-percent-enriched uranium, a type of fuel that can be easily converted to highly enriched uranium used in nuclear bombs.
• Iran’s entire stockpile of 20-percent fuel — just under 450 pounds — would have to be neutralized through conversion into metal or blending with natural uranium to reduce its purity.
• Iran would be required to halt work on building fuel rods or other components at its Arak plutonium facility.
• Iran’s nuclear facilities would be subject to unprecedented monitoring, with daily visits by international inspectors who also would have access to recordings by remote video equipment.
• Iran would receive economic incentives totalling $7 billion over the six months that the interim agreement is in place.
It is evident from the agreement that a number of restrictions have been placed on Iran with the specific aim of disrupting Iran’s ability to produce nuclear bombs. Furthermore, Iran has formally opened the door for further intrusive inspections that may lead to the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear capacity, which Tehran has painstakingly put in place over the past decade and has spent billions of dollars. Additionally, West’s success in dismantling Iraq’s military capability and Syria’s chemical weapons ability via UN inspections is an ominous sign of what may happen to Iran in the foreseeable future.
Yet despite this, Tehran continues to treat the Geneva agreement as a victory. For instance, Iran’s Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, has asserted that the agreement explicitly recognizes Iran’s right to enrich uranium. He also said the agreement effectively removed the threat of an American military strike. US Secretary of State, John Kerry rejected both of those contentions. Regarding America threat of force against Tehran, Kerry was unequivocal, he said, “The fact is, the president maintains” the option to use force “as commander in chief, and he has said specifically, he has not taken that threat off the table”.
So clearly, Iran is the real loser in this agreement, and the Jewish state and its patron America are true winners, as the Jewish state is not required to dismantle any of its 100 or so nuclear weapons, and America will use Iran to stabilise Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Islam forbids Muslim countries from surrendering their strategic assets to the colonialist powers. Allah says in the Quran:
وَلَنْ يَجْعَلَ اللَّهُ لِلْكَافِرِينَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ سَبِيلًا
“Allah will never allow the non-believers to have a way (sabil) over the believers.”
(An-Nisa: 141)
Rather than capitulating to Western powers and surrendering parts of the country’s nuclear infrastructure, Tehran should be working towards creating a variety of nuclear weapons that can be used to not only to safeguard Iran but protect the whole Muslim Ummah. This is in compliance with the following verse of Allah:
وَأَعِدُّوا لَهُمْ مَا اسْتَطَعْتُمْ مِنْ قُوَّةٍ وَمِنْ رِبَاطِ الْخَيْلِ تُرْهِبُونَ بِهِ عَدُوَّ اللَّهِ وَعَدُوَّكُمْ وَآخَرِينَ مِنْ دُونِهِمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَهُمُ اللَّهُ يَعْلَمُهُمْ وَمَا تُنْفِقُوا مِنْ شَيْءٍ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ يُوَفَّ إِلَيْكُمْ وَأَنْتُمْ لَا تُظْلَمُونَ
“And prepare against them what force you can and horses tied at the frontier, to frighten thereby the enemy of Allah and your enemy and others besides them, whom you do not know (but) Allah knows them; and whatever thing you will spend in Allah’s way, it will be paid back to you fully and you shall not be dealt with unjustly.”
(Anfal: 60)
But the truth of the matter is that the protection of the Muslim Ummah is far from the minds of Iranian leadership. Their strong support for the despotic Assad, cash payments to Karzai, assistance to Maliki’s regime to spread terror in Iraq, and now the surrender of the nuclear programme to the West, clearly illustrates that their allegiance lies with the enemies of the Ummah and confirms the words of Allah:
أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الَّذِينَ يَزْعُمُونَ أَنَّهُمْ آمَنُوا بِمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْكَ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ مِنْ قَبْلِكَ يُرِيدُونَ أَنْ يَتَحَاكَمُوا إِلَى الطَّاغُوتِ وَقَدْ أُمِرُوا أَنْ يَكْفُرُوا بِهِ وَيُرِيدُ الشَّيْطَانُ أَنْ يُضِلَّهُمْ ضَلَالًا بَعِيدًا
“Have you seen those who claim to believe in the revelation revealed to you and the revelation revealed earlier? They seek the ruling of taghoot (non-Islam) although they have been ordered to disbelieve in it.”
(An-Nisa: 60)
Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by
Abu Hashim