بِسْمِ اللّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ
Media Office in Afghanistan
Press Release
Date: 12th Rabi ul Awal, 1431 AH
No: 12, 1431
لزوال الدنيا أهون على الله من قتل مؤمن بغير حق
"The wiping away of the World means less to Allah than a Believer to be killed unjustly." (Ibn Maja)
In an airstrike on Sunday 21 February, NATO troops fired on a convoy of three vehicles in the south near the border of Uruzgan and Dai Kondi, killing at least 27 civilians, four women and a child, injuring another 12. The Afghan cabinet condemned the deaths as an "unjustifiable" act and the NATO commander Stanley McChrystal said in a statement: "I have made it clear to our forces that we are here to protect the Afghan people and inadvertently killing or injuring civilians undermines their trust and confidence in our mission.''
At least another 12 people were killed in a targeted rocket strike the day after the Operation "Mushtarak" this month in the Marja district of Helmand. And finally, more than 25 civilians have been killed in another NATO offensive; thus a total number of more than 60 civilians have been killed in the last few days.
What is the sense of such hypocritical remarks or statements by the occupying generals, saying that they would kill no civilians but doing exactly the opposite? Do they think that we are blind, or are those civilians not humans in their eyes? Are the puppet rulers our protectors? No, they are tyrants and dictators, employed by crusaders not by Muslims. Only the Imam or the Khalifah is a shield, behind whom you will fight and protect yourself.
This is the war of Obama and of the Western capitalists against the Muslim Ummah, rich in resources, possessive of the best religion. Has our prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم not said to us:
إنَّ النَّاسَ إَذا رَأوُا الظَّالِمَ فَلمْ يَأْخُذُوا عَلى يَدَيْهِ أوْشَكَ أن يَعُمَّهُمُ اللَّهُ بعِقَاب
"If the people witness an oppressor and they do not take him by his hands (to prevent him) then they are close to Allah covering them all with punishment." (Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, ibn Maja)
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Abdul-Kareem
said:
 |
Another example comparing how Muslims open new lands compared to western occupation is below. After getting on peaceful terms with the people of Syria and collecting the dues of the Jizya and the Kharaj , news reached Abu ‘Ubeida that the Byzantines had amassed their troops to attack him. The effect of this was great on Abu ‘Ubeida and the Muslims. He sent messages to the rulers of cities with whose citizens he had made peace, asking them to return to their subjects the paid dues of the Jizya and Kharaj with an instruction to tell them: ‘We hereby return to you the money you have paid us, because of the news of the enemy troops amassed to attack us, but, if God grants us victory against the enemy, we will keep up to the promise and covenant between us.' When this was delivered to the dhimmi and their money returned to them, they told the Muslims: ‘May God bring you back to us and grant you victory over them!' |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
Abbu Aaiya
said:
 |
Only once it happened in the past, that muslims conquered a land without inviting the inhabitants to islaam. The inhabitants of the land complained to the khaleefah that the armies of the khilaafah conquered the land without inviting them to islaam. The khaleefah pulled the armies out of the occupied land and paid compensation to the inhabitants of that land and then they invited them to islaam. All the inhabitants converted to islaam. This is because Islaam is the true deen and only system given by the creator to regulate the affairs of the human beings. Not like democracy, where for interest of few they destroy whole countries. They attack other countries and destroy them on the basis of lies e.g. Iraq. No WMD were found in Iraq. Inshallah once again by the implementation of khilaafah, islaam will end the oppression of humans. |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|