بِسْمِ اللّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ
The Media Office in Pakistan
PRESS STATEMENT
NO: Pr09049
Date: 20th Shawwal 1430 AH / 9th Oct 2009 CE
The traitor rulers have reduced Pakistan's Army into the world's cheapest private security firm for America
After Swat and Khyber, America is using Pak Army to break the hell loose on the people of S. Waziristan
After a conclusive and clear-cut diktat from America, the government of Pakistan has finalized its preparations for a full-scale military offensive in Waziristan. Food and necessary supplies have already been cut-off for the residents in South Waziristan for the last two months. On his way back from America, Zardari, a president on American payroll, announced this operation in London in May 2009. Same was the case for Swat operation which was started by Zardari while he was in America after the displeasure and intimidation by Hillary Clinton. The fact is that under American dictates, the government first decides to undertake the operation and then works to concoct excuses and reasons to convince the masses. By handing over the services of Pakistan armed forces to USA over just re-imbursement of expenses and Eid gifts the government has turned our armed forces into the world's cheapest private security firm. And now by attacking Waziristan with two division forces, the government is lending support to the America's losing crusade in Afghanistan - to which even America and Europe themselves are reluctant to lend their "precious" blood.
In the previous military operation in Swat, the government killed thousands of children, elderly and women besides turning millions homeless. The government destroyed their homes, markets and roads and termed it a ‘bitter pill' which they had to swallow. They further claimed that if the masses "sacrificed" and accepted these losses for once the government will be able to clear the area from terrorists and achieve complete and lasting peace. But after destruction and losses to the tune of billions of rupees, instead of achieving peace Malakand has been converted into a ‘Mega Jail' by imposing curfews while people starve in their homes. Despite destruction of their fruit farms and crops, neither all "terrorist" were arrested nor killed rather they simply shifted to new areas while bomb blasts and chaos still prevails.
Hizb ut-Tahrir forewarned the people prior to military operation that defeating terrorism is just an excuse while in reality America is fighting the people of the region under the guise of fighting militants. It is the people of this region who did their level best in helping their Afghan brothers across the Durand Line. America is aware that until and unless she does not crush the Jihad loving Islamists of the tribal area or disenchant them from Islam, she cannot win the war in Afghanistan. That is why the Waziristan operation in 2003-4 which America conducted through Pak Army was an utter failure since there was no public opinion to support it, especially amongst the soldiers who were not prepared to kill their own Muslim brothers for the sake of America.
As a result the government was forced to halt the military operation and sign a deal with Nek Muhammad, who was later martyred by American missile attack. This was enough for America to realize that unless the resistance is not discredited amongst the Pakistani people and the Armed Forces, she can never succeed in her objectives. Thus, American and Pakistani spy agencies started infiltrating the militants and did certain actions that would give a bad name to the resistance and make them unpopular. Later, according to a plan, the government of Pakistan allowed these "extremists" to openly establish training camps and launch radio stations.
Moreover, they were allowed to recruit from masses as well as harass the population. In the mean time, the government intentionally weakened its grip allowing its writ to deplete and then started a powerful propaganda campaign in the media that extremists are challenging the writ of the state. They also propagated that the situation is so bad that extremists can actually capture Islamabad anytime. On the other hand, American spy agencies and mercenaries of Blackwater were given free rein in Pakistan resulting into Iraq style bombings in the cities. The sole purpose of which was to create public opinion for military operation in the tribal belt and its surrounding areas. Broadcasting the lashing video and airing the images of hundreds of destroyed schools was very effectively used to further infuriate the already angry people of Pakistan to an extent that voices calling or military operation started to come from all directions of Pakistan. This was the heinous plan undertaken by the Pakistani government which not only helped them to impose a brutal war on the Muslims of the frontier belt but they also succeeded in throwing the brave and fearless soldiers of Pak Army into this pit of fire under the pretext of Indian presence and involvement in the Tribal belt. If India is actually present in this area and meddling in our affairs then why doesn't Pakistan bring these proofs on any of the international forums? Rather Pakistan is willing to go as humiliatingly low as possible in its endeavour to create brotherly relationship with India.
This is the reality of ‘War of Terror' whereby America is killing many birds with one stone. On the one hand America is engaging the jihad loving Muslims inside Pakistan thus preventing them from going to Afghanistan while on the other hand she is disenchanting the masses from Islam. Moreover, she is making Pak Army fight its own citizens so that they do not even think about their responsibility of kicking America out of this region.
O Muslims! The time has come for you to stop the government from repeating the blunder of Waziristan operation after they have massacred in Swat. Do you not see, the moment the government decided to launch operation in Waziristan, bomb blasts in major cities have increased? Same is the case with load-shedding which is increased to an extent that the people are so preoccupied with their own problems that they don't even get the chance to know what is happening with their Muslim brothers in the Tribal belt. O Muslims! Millions will be displaced again in the coming winter and hundreds of Muslims will die, if not thousands. The killer and the killed both will be believers. You will have to stop this oppression by coming on streets and roads. You will have to kick-out America and Blackwater to fulfil your responsibility.
O Armed Forces of Pakistan! These are the same tribesmen along with whom you expelled USSR from this region. They used to love you and you respected them. Then who is the one who turned you against each other? Indeed it all started with the advent of US troops in the region. Know thy enemy and support your brothers who are busy in expelling the crusaders from the region instead of lending support to the devil, the USA. Bear in mind, It is not acceptable in front of Allah سبحانه وتعالى in any case that you kill Muslims by allying with Kuffar. Allah سبحانه وتعالى said:
وَمَنْ يَقْتُلْ مُؤْمِنًا مُتَعَمِّدًا فَجَزَاؤُهُ جَهَنَّمُ خَالِدًا فِيهَا وَغَضِبَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَلَعَنَهُ وَأَعَدَّ لَهُ عَذَابًا عَظِيمًا
"And whoever kills a believer intentionally, his Recompense is Hell to abide therein, and the Wrath and the Curse of Allâh are upon him, and a great punishment is prepared for Him." (An-Nisa; 93)
You are the largest Muslim military power from Central Asia to the Indian Ocean and its you who have to take care of the Muslims of this region. Rise to the occasion! And give Nussrah to Hizb ut-Tahrir to reestablish the Khilafah and attain the title of Ansar-a-thani (the second Ansar) in the pages of history. Indeed it is big success for this world and the hereafter.
Naveed Butt
Official Spokesman of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Pakistan
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Abdul-Kareem
said:
 |
RE: Haziq Its not correct to say, "As for the rest of Muslims anywhere else, it is not permitted for them to go to to war until the Ameer said so." D Here is an answer to a previous question on the topic of jihad that is the strongest opinion in my view and addresses your point. From the Book Shakhsiyah Islamiyah Volume 2 page 156 fourth edition printed 1995 ce and 1416: “Jihad is fard Kifayah to inititiate (the fighting) and Fard Ayni when the enemy attacks, upon the ones who are being attacked (ala man haajimuhum) and fard kifayah upon the rest (of the Ummah). This fard is not silenced until the enemy has been repelled and the Islamic land has been purified from its rijs impurity”. If an Islamic country was exposed to attack from the enemy, then the fight against the enemy becomes fard ‘ain (personal obligation) upon the people of that land (country). If the repelling of the enemy could not happen with the inhabitants of this land, than it becomes fard ‘ain upon the Muslims who are the nearest (geographically) to this land, then those who follow them (geographically) and so on until the repelling of the enemy is achieved, even if this obligation included all of the Muslims. If the enemy occupied the country and dominated over the Muslims within it and imposed its authority upon them and they became unable to fight against it, to remove the authority from them, then they are treated as if the are captives (prisoners of war). The fard ‘ain, in this case, would be upon the Muslims who came next to them (geographically) and so on, until the occupation is removed and the country returns to Bilad al Islam (the land of Islam). To say that Jihad becomes fard ‘ain on Muslims means that it is upon those who are capable amongst them, i.e. the armies and those who are like them (i.e. have military power). This is because the ‘capability’ (Istita’ah) is (indirectly) understood in every hukm shar’i. Therefore it is incorrect to change the definition and thus say that Jihad is fard ‘ain upon the armies instead of upon the Muslims, this is because the mentioning of ‘Muslims’ is more general, and it is clear in it that it is a duty (fard) upon those who are qualified and have the capability and ability to fighting in the manner which the shara’ has explained. This can be seen in history when Palestine was occupied by the Crusaders for 100 years, the scholars said Jihad against them was Fard Ain, however did they all practically oblige everyone to move there and go to fight? In fact if this was the case all the scholars themselves would have moved there and fought against the crusaders which clearly didn’t happen. Therefore it is clear that they understood the hukm in the same way and this is the classical position. The unity of the Muslim countries is a fard, and the fight against the enemy who attacks is also a fard. The fact that the Muslims countries are not united and their armies are divided does not mean that it is a duty to first unify their armies then thereafter fight against their enemy, based upon the consideration that one army is not sufficient to remove the occupation. Rather Muslims are obliged to work to achieve all the duties, so they establish a state that unites their countries and unites their armies, and also they fight their enemy if they are attacked and do not hesitate from doing so under the pretext of waiting until they unify their armies. Any ruler from amongst the Muslim countries, who declare the fight against the kafir enemy and orders his army to move for battle, then the duty upon the army, is to move to fight the kafir enemy as long as the fight is against the kuffar. The Ummah is obliged to support that unless the ruler moves the army to fight against the Muslims or drives the army to fall (a planned defeat) in a planned trap to enable the enemy to kill a large number of Muslims. In these two cases, that is to fight against the Muslims and the conspiracy with the enemy to kill the Muslims, it is not allowed to fight (together) with the rulers, and in this case the Ummah and the army have to prevent the rulers and make the fight against the kuffar and not against the Muslims. The discussion with the Ummah should be to explain the hukm shari’ in fighting the enemy if they occupied any of the Muslim countries or in case they declared war against them, and to show that the rulers have cancelled Jihad. Also that it is a duty upon the armies to move so as to fight against the enemy and so on so as to move the rulers who suspend the Jihad, and to move also to establish the Khilafah State and appoint a Khaleefah who rules with that which Allah (swt) has revealed and makes Jihad fe Sabeelillah. Calling the Ummah and her armies to execute this fard is one of the actions of the Hizb, which they perform, which should be according to the method explained in the stages of the progression of the Hizb. |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
Haziq
said:
 |
Assalamualaikum. Please do correct me if I'm wrong. But I thought that if the enemy arrives, Jihad becomes fard ul-ayn on the murabitoon (border guards). In this case Pakistan is at the border of Afghanistan, thus making Muslimin there obligated to help, right? As for the rest of Muslims anywhere else, it is not permitted for them to go to to war until the Ameer said so. Since there is no Ameer just yet, it is obligated for to all of us Muslims to appoint one. In no way that unity and efforts to bring our life to Islam is being undermine here, both are still paramount tasks for us to do complete. What I'm saying is that everybody have different obligations here: Muslims directly attacked need to defend their homes; neighboring Muslims must give aid; and EVERYBODY must work to change Muslim's fikrah today to Islam, and return the Khilafah to the Muslim's world. I don't think we have the rights to tell Muslims in Afghanistan or in Pakistan to lower their weapons. Maybe the methods they use to fight back could be wrong, but they must fight back nonetheless. Again, correct me if I'm wrong. Allahu'alam. |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
Abu Yusuf al-Hanbali
said:
 |
Assalaamu alaikum May Allah make it easy upon the believers in these horrific times. Danish made the correct assessment that we need unity. However he did not elaborate in what kind of Unity. And Abdul Kareem answered correctly that unity has to be the Political Unity and this naturally manifest in the existence of Khilafah. We also need to understand that the current disunity is something that emanates from the existing regimes, which they take pride in maintaining by promoting nationalism, patriotism, spiritual secularism, individualism, etc also making muslims work on themslevs without bothering or accounting them, so they are more than happy to publish books on 'aqeedah, akhlaq, adab...every individual matter! The sad reality is many get caught up in a catch 22: that how do we establish Khilafah when we have disunity in the first place! So they concentrate on working for Unity on an individual level and do not realize that their actions have no affect in society, in fact it does not even enter the political medium! This is simply due to the dominant opinions or the public norms maintained by the authority and civil society. The Khilafah may be the ruling system of Islam but its establishment requires also changing the public norms aswell as the rulers, this naturally leads to changing society. And change of society leads to changing of individuals. This is the method of Islam, the method of RasulAllah (saws). Ma as salam |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
Danish
said:
 |
Dear Abdul-Karim and UmmSulayman... Thank you very much for your replies, which basically support my very own: That unity (knowledge) is necessary before action (in this case armed jihad). By the way, UmmSulayman, nowhere did I mention that the companions were cowards or anything of that sort. Allah's curse be on me if I even think of such a thing. You said it yourself, the prophet s.a.w was not ordered to fight before moving to medina. Once the base was established, the sword was raised. I again implore you to understand that the modern islamic movement will again have to be fought with knowledge, kindness and tolerance so as to unite the disbanded muslim ummah. When Allah s.w.t. has asked us to invite non-muslims to islam based on the things common between us and them, why can't we do the same with our own fellow muslims? |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
ummsulayman2001
said:
 |
The love of Jihad runs in the veins of the Mukmin. Only those who are COWARDS will say...don't mention jihad or don't talk about Jihad whilst our enemies are butchering our brothers, sisters, mothers and fathers. Allah swt "And what is wrong with you that you fight not in the Cause of Allah, and for those weak, ill-treated, and oppressed among men, women and children, whose cry is "Our Lord! Rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors; and raise for us from You one who will protect, and raise for us from You one who will help. However, the only real solution is when the Jihad is carried by an Islamic army who can liberate the land and implement Islam under leadership of the Ameer/Khalif. The sahabah were ready to fight in Makkah but the Prophet (saw) said, "I've not been ordered to fight yet". It doesn't mean they were cowards and compromising (Astaghfirullah) but it means that once the Islamic state was established, the Muslims from Madinah were able to fight the Makkan Quraysh effectively and even conquered them. Alhamdulillah. |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
Abdul-Kareem
said:
|
Here is a nice article summarising the method of working for Khilafah. As with any problems we face Islam has given us a solution in the Qur'an and Sunnah. If we stick to the sunnah in establishing the Khilafah inshAllah we will get the victory of Allah. http://www.khilafah.com/index....r-khilafah |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
Danish
said:
|
And furthermore, here's what I think the strategy of the so-called jihadis should be. For now, lower their weapons. This strategy has failed miserably and has caused nothing but death, destruction and unimaginable disunity among the muslim ummah. Disperse around the world to call people towards islam through high moral character, truthfullness and justice. Become integrated in the communities where they go so that muslims the world over realize the true message of Allah and his Last Messenger. This message has been forgotten and that is why the ummah is in such a condition. Then, once the message of Islam spreads at the grass roots level, bring about an islamic change in governments by removing the rulers who have harmed the muslim population more than any non-muslim. The removal must not necessarity be through a violence ridden coup, but rather a call to the true message of Islam. If the rulers are muslims, they will listen and revert. Then once the governments are on board and have the willingness to sit together and give first preference to islam's interests rather than their own, THEN we can stand as a united force against oppression of muslims. |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
Danish
said:
|
Dear Abdul Kareem, What I'm trying to say is that FIRST and FOREMOST the muslims will need to come back to the roots of Islam to forge unity amongst themselves. Then and ONLY then will they be granted victory by Alla s.w.t. over the enemies of Islam/muslims. As long as we are divided, we will be defeated over and over and over again. Sadly, no one is paying attention to this basic rule. Furthermore, you are right, when you say "The Islamic rule when kuffar come and occupy Muslim land and fight and kill Muslims is clear cut i.e. fight jihad against them." Tell me, when was the first battle of islam fought? Was it before or after the migration to Medina? It was after the migration, when the Holy Prophet (S.A.W) had established a region where the people WILLINGLY accepted to lead their lives according to Islamic injunctions rather than having these injunctions enforced upon them. Once a base had been established, the jihad (struggle) to spread the word of Allah and protect muslim life and property began. Let's be objective for a moment. What we see in the phenomenon of the pakistani taliban is the practice of "putting the cart in front of the horse." We see forced gruesome executions without any form of trial whatsoever, kidnapping, suicide bombings to DESTROY MUSLIM LIFE AND PROPERTY. The army is no different either, with mass airforce bombings and other atrocities being committed in the northern areas. So in short, I again stress my earlier statement: Unity is what the muslim ummah should be striving for first before picking up the sword!!!! Be realistic please. |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
salman
said:
 |
The Pak army should be renamed PAKWATER as it serves the interest of the US while it is being humiliated through the Kerry-Lugar Bill which places humiating conditions on it obtaining further handouts! The criminal army generals should learn the lesson of history that treachery will be repaid by treachery! The US will bribe Mr 10% with billions in aid while the generals will be forced to take a huge pay cut unless they deliver results on fighting America's war. This bill is a slap in the face to the PAK army and her bribe is now "performance-related". How low can these generals go?? |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
Abdul-Kareem
said:
|
RE: Danish Supporting Islam means following the rules laid down in the Holy Qur'an and Sunnah. The Islamic rule when kuffar come and occupy Muslim land and fight and kill Muslims is clear cut i.e. fight jihad against them. This is the case in Afghanistan. Therefore supporting Islam means supporting the resistance to occupation in Afghanistan which should be performed by the Pakistan army not just Muslim resistance groups. Certainly disunity is at the root of all Muslim problems today but this is a political disunity caused by the absence of one Islamic State to unify all the Muslim lands. Differences of race, colour, fiqh etc have always existed but Islam is what transcends thse superficial differences uniting Arab with non-Arab, black with white, Hanafi with Shafi'i etc. |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
Danish
said:
|
There is a difference between supporting Islam and supporting Taliban. The above article is full of rhetoric to support the taliban in afghanistan, rathern than Islam around the world. We muslims can't even decide on a single fiqh among ourselves and kill each other over petty differences. So how can we possibly fight when we are divided by fiqh, region, race, color etc. As long as we remain divided, we will remain defeated. In short, Unity is what the muslim ummah should be striving for first before picking up the sword!!!! Be realistic please. |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
said:
 |
Oh, the PAK army, I join my brother Naveed Butt from Africa to appeal to you to choose JANAA over American handouts. Kill Muslim brothers and sign for punishment of Allah sw. وَمَنْ يَقْتُلْ مُؤْمِنًا مُتَعَمِّدًا فَجَزَاؤُهُ جَهَنَّمُ خَالِدًا فِيهَا وَغَضِبَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَلَعَنَهُ وَأَعَدَّ لَهُ عَذَابًا عَظِيمًا("And whoever kills a believer intentionally, his Recompense is Hell to abide therein, and the Wrath and the Curse of Allâh are upon him, and a great punishment is prepared for Him." (An-Nisa; 93) America will apardon you as soon as you help them establish their goal. Remember Sadam, they used him and finally hanged him like a dog. Do you think they love you more than he? No way! please listen to the calll made by brother Naveed and get Allah's pleasure that is endless both in this world and the hereafter. DO YOU FEAR AMERICA that is challenged by very poor, stateless people like Somalia instead of fearing ALLAH SW who created you and whose hand victory lies? Are you people who have brains? Cann't you learn from history? The love for this world will humiliate you in this world. Seek for the pleasure that is endless by arresting Zandari and his goverment and return the Islamic Khilafah that the muslim world from Africa to Asia is crying for. and Certainly, you will have more wealth than America is promising you and yet, you will have Janaa with Allah sw(indeed, the real success) abshabs of Africa |
|
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|